24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kongfeng87

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

金虫

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 6594.6
散金: 1355
红花: 6
帖子: 1923
在线: 297.1小时
虫号: 915495
注册: 2009-11-28
性别: GG
专业: 神经科学、认知科学与心理

[交流] 外审意见回来了，应该是major revise。想让大家看看，有多大机会录用已有29人参与

外审意见回来了，应该是大修。想让大家看看，有多大机会
主编意见：On the basis of these reviews and my own reading, I am sorry to conclude that the manuscript is not in a shape in which it can be published in xxxxxxxxx. Yet, if you feel that you can address my points and the reviewers' points in a satisfying way,I encourage you to revise your manuscript.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.
Reviewer #1: Overall, the text would benefit greatly from a revision by a native English speaker as there are still many grammatical problems with the manuscript, which make it difficult to follow. In particular, please change all sentences with the structure 'no any ? to 'no' only. Please use past tense throughout and check your prepositions.
Although the findings are important and interesting the manuscript still needs work to improve clarity and language.
Reviewer #2:The authors addressed an important issue using an interesting design. The results are new and interesting. However, at the moment the paper has several shortcomings that need to be revised (see comments). One important weakness of the paper is the language. The introduction and discussion need further revision in order to improve the readability of the paper. Additionally, the rationale of Experiment 1 needs to be elaborated (see comment). In summary, although design and results are interesting the MS needs a substantial revision before publication.

[ Last edited by kongfeng87 on 2011-5-22 at 19:13 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

求个博导看看已经有17人回复
青基代表作，AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗？还是归为workshop之流？已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有11人回复
自荐读博已经有5人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生已经有4人回复
求助院士们，这个如何合成呀已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有9人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有11人回复

1楼 2011-05-05 15:22:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

wenjing028

铁虫 (正式写手)

应助: 14 (小学生)
金币: 93
散金: 813
红花: 23
帖子: 422
在线: 1275.3小时
虫号: 474077
注册: 2007-12-05
专业: 无机纳米化学

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖

No problem. 修文章是件很伤脑上火的事，慢慢来，我从今年2.14大修（3次）小修（2次）了4篇文章，都快彻底崩溃了，不过还好，都接受了，记住了：审稿人是爷，你脾气再大，论点再有根据，都不能正面顶撞这些爷，相反的，你应该学会用实验数据，实验事实，以及前人数据/实验来说话，编辑会有一个正确的判断的（除非你碰上了外行编辑），你回答的越好，就越能否定这些爷，我的一个大修就是直接接受，没有再发给审稿人。
回答问题的时候可以先写个毛坯，然后再慢慢修饰，记住了：同一句话，有很多种表达方法和语气，尽量优化每一个句子！
写完了，隔两天，再看看，再修修，自然就好！
原则是：态度认真，尽人事，听天命！做到自己不后悔！