| ²é¿´: 2082 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
ttkxgp7978ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¹ØÓÚͶ¸å»Ø¸´ÐżþµÄÊéдÎÊÌâ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
We recently invited you to revise your above-referenced manuscript in accordance with the reviewers' comments, but have not yet received your manuscript. We would appreciate your letting us know if we can expect to receive a revision. If you are revising the work, please be sure to include with the revised manuscript a list of changes or a rebuttal to each point raised by the reviewers. ¡¡ I look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ÎÒ±¾´òËã³·¸åµÄ£¬µ«ÏÖÔÚÏëÌí¼ÓһЩʵÑé½á¹ûÖØÐÂͶ¸å£¬ÒòΪÉó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÒµÄÒâ¼ûºÜ´ó£¬ÈÏΪÎÒ̬¶È²»ÈÏÕæ£¬ÉÏ´ÎͶ¸åÖл¹³öÏÖÁËÒ»¸öÃ÷ÏÔµÄÑÜÉä±ê¶¨´íÎó¡£ ¿É×î½üÎÒÏëÖØÐÂÊéд£¬²¢ÇÒҪɾ³ý²¿·Ö½á¹û£¬Ìí¼Óнá¹û£¬²»ÖªµÀ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø¸´ÄØ£¬ÕâÑùд¿ÉÒÔÂ𣿠Thank you very much for your letter dated Apr. 21, 2011. I together with the co-authors really appreciate your efforts and reviewers on our manuscript that was submitted to Materials and Design. And also we agree with the reviewer¡¯ comments. But we find there are some technical issues; we regret that we can not revise our work in short time. I am really very sorry, and asking for about another month time. лл¸÷λÀ²£¡ PS£º Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: On the one hand, the authors didn't revise the manuscript carefully. There are still so many grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences, i.e., the level of English throughout this manuscript does not meet the journal's desired standard. On the other hand, the novelty of this manuscript is not obvious. So, this reviewer strongly think that this manuscript cannot be accepted by this journal. Reviewer #2: The revised manuscript reflect the reviewers' comments and suggestions the clarity and contributions are improved Editor: Please get your paper professional language reviewed in order to be able to proceed further with your paper. [ Last edited by ttkxgp7978 on 2011-4-24 at 15:39 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0854¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì 359Çóµ÷¼Á ¿É¿çרҵ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Áº³ÉΰÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×é»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á0703
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»·¾³¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£¬±¾¿Æ211£¬0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ñÄêµÄ¹ú»ù½ðÊÇ´ò·ÖÖÆÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì£¨085601£©×¨Ë¶ÓпÆÑоÀúÈýÏî¹ú½±Á½¸öʵÓÃÐÍרÀûÒ»ÏîÊ¡¼¶Á¢Ïî
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÓïÑÔÎÊÌâ±»¾ÜÁ½´ÎͶ¸åÐÅÔõôд
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å¼¸Ìì¾Í³öÏÖSent Back to Author£¬Í¨ÐÅ×÷ÕßÐÅÏäÎÞÐżþ¡£¸ÃÈçºÎ¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅѯÎÊ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çë½Ì ¹ØÓÚÎÄÕ·¢±í¹ý³ÌÖÐ ¿É²»¿ÉÒÔ¸øÔÓ־дÓʼþѯÎÊ ÎÄÕÂÉó¸å½ø³ÌµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
revision Ðżþ£¬¿´²»³öÎÊÌâ°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÒòΪÍËÐÞÐżþ¶ªÊ§£¬ÂÛÎı»³ÆÐ´µÃ²»ºÃ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
дÐÞ¸ÄÐÅʱҪ°ÑreviewerµÄÒâ¼ûÔÑùÕ³ÉÏ£¬È»ºóÒ»Ò»»Ø¸´Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çó Applied surface science »Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÐżþ¸ñʽ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
pangmingju
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
²©Ê¿
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8633.5
- É¢½ð: 6
- ºì»¨: 5
- ɳ·¢: 29
- Ìû×Ó: 2587
- ÔÚÏß: 806.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 872376
- ×¢²á: 2009-10-14
- רҵ: ¶àÏàÁ÷ÈÈÎïÀíѧ

2Â¥2011-04-24 15:43:10
deng1027
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.291
- ½ð±Ò: 7101
- É¢½ð: 636
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1701
- ÔÚÏß: 203.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 596378
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
1¡¢¾¡Á¿Ð޸ģ¬ÔÙͶһÏÂÊÔÒ»ÊÔ£» 2¡¢Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û±È½Ï¼¤ÁÒ£¬Ö÷±à¸øÐÞ¸ÄÓ¦¸Ã¶ÔÄãµÄÓ¡Ïó»¹ÊDz»´íµÄ£» 3¡¢×£ºÃÔË£¡ |
3Â¥2011-04-24 15:44:12
ttkxgp7978
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4394.1
- É¢½ð: 92
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 502
- ÔÚÏß: 244.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 755586
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϵĺϽðÏà¡¢Ïà±ä¼°
4Â¥2011-04-25 18:29:10













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20