应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语
585/6返回列表上一页123456下一页
查看: 5423  |  回复: 57
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

wolfzhong

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by sakkima at 2011-04-25 08:44:12:
不是很恶毒啊。。。。

听说有审稿意见写“这是我见过的最烂的论文！建议作者改行”

这个真狠！。。。。。。

晕
回复此楼
41楼2011-04-25 21:33:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangxh1234

银虫 (职业作家)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
管他呢，要相信自己
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
42楼2011-04-25 22:42:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ososo

新虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by yyshea at 2011-04-24 09:01:17:
各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语，全当娱乐。

我一次投稿，一个大哥给的意见是“nothing can be take home” 估计哥们儿是下午喝完咖啡 吃完点心 心情不好。。郁闷了我好久 屡次怀疑自己 哈哈哈

看看下面的这些，你会觉得老外很无辜，审稿很痛苦的，
--I have found this ms. boring to death.

--The peaceful atmosphere between Christmas and New Year was transiently disrupted by reading this manuscript.

-This one almost killed me. I am a ‘detail person’, obviously.

--I am sorry that I have spoiled my Xmas holidays with such a bad manuscript.

--I am fed up with people ignoring totally the instructions for authors.

--I wonder if you and I do not have better things to do than help people who can’t help themselves.

--My heart sinks when I have to review papers from this group as I know my response is most likely going to be as long as the paper.

--I hate this paper. It’s a bunch of engineers trying to do microbial ecology by numbers and not thinking about what/why they are doing it.

--This paper is essentially illegible. I have made suggestions for improvement to the authors, but a full list would have taken much longer than this paper is worth. You will see that I tried to be civil to the authors, as I assume they tried their best to write a good paper.

--Reject – did not meet any of their objectives.

--This is an altogether dispensable paper. The contribution to the field is ZERO.

--This is an essentially unreadable paper sent to the wrong journal.

--This is the most chaotic manuscript I have ever had for review. I am sorry for the colleagues to have wasted such an amount of time and resources to put this non-informative manuscript together and am I sorry for me to have read it many times to find at least something which is valid (but I could not find a single piece).

--Feels like banging my head against a brick wall with this one.

--This paper is long-winded. You can reject it without causing damage for the scientific community.
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
43楼2011-04-26 00:01:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

donkeypku

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

两院院士
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
There is no physics in this paper.
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
博观约取，厚积薄发
44楼2011-04-26 00:36:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

csni

新虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by yyshea at 2011-04-24 09:01:17:
各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语，全当娱乐。

我一次投稿，一个大哥给的意见是“nothing can be take home” 估计哥们儿是下午喝完咖啡 吃完点心 心情不好。。郁闷了我好久 屡次怀疑自己 哈哈哈

NOTHING CAN BE TAKEN HOME.
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
45楼2011-04-26 03:20:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

六合核弹头

金虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
This paper is certainly not acceptable for ANY serious journal. My recommendation is "firm rejection" and that the manuscript be NOT encouraged to be resubmitted.
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
46楼2011-04-26 06:43:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hwgl

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
刚收到的the conclusions appear to be highly speculative
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
47楼2011-04-26 08:23:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuanshou968

金虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
专家有好坏之分，水平高低之别，所以才送审2-3人。以防害群之马出现么。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
48楼2011-04-26 08:30:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

蓝色游鱼归情

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

鱼
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
Originally posted by weepyboy at 2011-04-24 09:29:33:
回复，是我看不懂你在说什么？

那说明你写的太深了。。。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
据说鱼只有七秒的记忆。。。
49楼2011-04-26 17:01:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zyxme
50楼2011-04-26 17:22:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yyshea 的主题更新
585/6返回列表上一页123456下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭