24小时热门版块排行榜

南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2026级博士研究生招生报考通知（长期有效）

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yyshea

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: -940.6
散金: 5221
帖子: 482
在线: 176.8小时
虫号: 936653
注册: 2010-01-04
专业: 生物化工与食品化工

[交流] 各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语已有52人参与

各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语，全当娱乐。

我一次投稿，一个大哥给的意见是“nothing can be take home” 估计哥们儿是下午喝完咖啡吃完点心心情不好。。郁闷了我好久屡次怀疑自己哈哈哈

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有3人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷已经有12人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？已经有3人回复
2026博士申请-功能高分子，水凝胶方向已经有6人回复
论文投稿，期刊推荐已经有4人回复
硕士和导师闹得不愉快已经有13人回复
请问2026国家基金面上项目会启动申2停1吗已经有5人回复

1楼2011-04-24 09:01:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ososo

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 186.4
散金: 70
红花: 1
帖子: 150
在线: 56.6小时
虫号: 1221201
注册: 2011-03-04
专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

Originally posted by yyshea at 2011-04-24 09:01:17:
各位交流一下收到最恶毒的评语，全当娱乐。

我一次投稿，一个大哥给的意见是“nothing can be take home” 估计哥们儿是下午喝完咖啡吃完点心心情不好。。郁闷了我好久屡次怀疑自己哈哈哈

看看下面的这些，你会觉得老外很无辜，审稿很痛苦的，

--I have found this ms. boring to death.

--The peaceful atmosphere between Christmas and New Year was transiently disrupted by reading this manuscript.

-This one almost killed me. I am a ‘detail person’, obviously.

--I am sorry that I have spoiled my Xmas holidays with such a bad manuscript.

--I am fed up with people ignoring totally the instructions for authors.

--I wonder if you and I do not have better things to do than help people who can’t help themselves.

--My heart sinks when I have to review papers from this group as I know my response is most likely going to be as long as the paper.

--I hate this paper. It’s a bunch of engineers trying to do microbial ecology by numbers and not thinking about what/why they are doing it.

--This paper is essentially illegible. I have made suggestions for improvement to the authors, but a full list would have taken much longer than this paper is worth. You will see that I tried to be civil to the authors, as I assume they tried their best to write a good paper.

--Reject – did not meet any of their objectives.

--This is an altogether dispensable paper. The contribution to the field is ZERO.

--This is an essentially unreadable paper sent to the wrong journal.

--This is the most chaotic manuscript I have ever had for review. I am sorry for the colleagues to have wasted such an amount of time and resources to put this non-informative manuscript together and am I sorry for me to have read it many times to find at least something which is valid (but I could not find a single piece).

--Feels like banging my head against a brick wall with this one.

--This paper is long-winded. You can reject it without causing damage for the scientific community.