| 查看: 1961 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者footvox将赠送您 1 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
拜求大家帮忙看看这个拒稿信？？？
|
|||
|
看了编辑的结论，是拒稿，可以自己选择是修改继续投或者放弃改投其他杂志。大家帮我看看吧，自己不知道该怎么办？ 适当拒稿对待还是大修还是修改后重投？重投还是要换一轮的审稿专家么？ From Editor Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of ***. I have now received 3 reviews of your manuscript. I am sorry to inform you that based on the reviews of your manuscript, I have decided to decline it for publication in Journal of *** at this time. While the manuscript is not acceptable now, with additional work, as outlined in the comments, I believe that you will be able to turn this into a more suitable paper. I am rejecting it now so as not to put a time constraint on your revision and allow you ample time to complete the additional work. Once the revisions are complete, I would like to encourage you to resubmit the paper. If you resubmit this paper, please note that you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks as well as a "tracked-changes" (changes highlighted or otherwise noted) version of your manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be treated as a new submission. From report of associated editor All of the reviewers agree that the paper potentially has some valuable resutls, but also that it has significant problems and needs a lot of work before it is ready to be published. I recommend that the authors be given the chance to revise the manuscript (in agreement with reviewers #2 and #3), and if they do not address the reviewers suggestions satisfactorily or they are unable to address them in a reasonable amount of time, that the paper be rejected and the authors be encouraged to resubmit taking the reviewers suggestions into account. I marked the English editing issue because of comments made by reviewer #1. It might be worthwhile pointing out to the authors that some of the issues are major questions about the overall approach, while others are details that are unclear to the reader, or perhaps were inadvertantly left out. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
这种人痛苦吗
已经有14人回复
-
我感觉当老师好累啊。。
已经有9人回复
-
评正教授需要两个国家级项目，有人用子课题糊弄，结果在评审前资格公示时被举报拿下了
已经有31人回复
-
chemical science和advanced science哪个好一点
已经有6人回复
-
国内期刊审稿人数量
已经有5人回复
-
中南大学 粉末冶金国家重点实验室 陈超教授课题组拟招收 1~2位博士研究生通知
已经有18人回复
-
angew三个小修，返修过去已经20多天了没动静，有朋友遇到这种情况吗？
已经有5人回复
-
随缘读博 一篇中科院一区Top 一篇中科院二区Top 两篇专利
已经有15人回复
-
找不到审稿人
已经有6人回复
-
职称论文
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请问大家这个算是拒稿吗？
已经有10人回复
- 写了催稿信，编辑的回复，大家帮忙看看
已经有7人回复
- 一篇拒稿信，请各位虫友帮分析下
已经有12人回复
- 帮忙给看看这是什么错误，怎么改呢？谢谢~
已经有8人回复
- 论文返修后被拒，求帮忙看看拒信
已经有27人回复
- 拒稿信，求各位
已经有15人回复
- 帮忙看看这封信怎么回复啊？
已经有17人回复
- 请问这份拒稿信说的是什么意思
已经有33人回复
- 第一篇SCI，大家帮我看看如何回复
已经有11人回复
- 怎么没有拒稿信
已经有10人回复
- 紧急！收到校稿信，请大家帮我看看，谢谢。
已经有15人回复
- 请教这样的拒稿信怎么处理？
已经有8人回复
- 拒稿信还需要回复吗？
已经有11人回复
- 校稿信看不明白，请虫虫帮忙
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个拒稿信的意思？
已经有8人回复
- 第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮忙看下这封拒稿信是什么意思，还能继续投这个期刊吗？先谢谢各位了。
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮忙看看，这样的拒稿信有申辩的希望吗？
已经有3人回复
- 收到的最快的拒稿信！
已经有38人回复
- 被拒稿，理由很牵强，也很无奈，各位虫友帮忙看看合不合理。谢谢
已经有62人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个拒稿信是什么意思？
已经有10人回复
- 帮忙看看APL的拒信，重投还有希望吗？
已经有16人回复
- 大家帮忙看看，这是做什么的的，已经给发三封信啦
已经有24人回复
10楼2011-04-21 20:43:41
20