24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zoudujian

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 2925.7
帖子: 521
在线: 6330小时
虫号: 748985

[交流] 大修中的大修+提交修改稿+with editor半月=啥情况？

以前在版上发过审稿意见，可惜大家搭理我的比较少，同学鉴定稿件为大修中的大修，大家帮忙鉴定一下，反正是第一次投国际期刊，被拒了几次现在脸皮已经有相当的厚度了，有啥意见给俺提一下。另外，这个稿件的审稿流程也不太了解，我的修改稿提交已经with editor半个月了，编辑是要把修改稿重新发给以前的审稿人审么，还是另找审稿人。还有我见版上的很多审稿意见都是按审稿人分开写的，我的情况看着就一个审稿人的意见，是不是只有一个人的审稿意见回来编辑就决定把我文章退回来修改了，求解惑。。。
！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！（审稿意见）
Ms. Ref. No.:  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Title: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Construction & Building Materials

Dear Mr. %%%%%,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/conbuildmat/ and login as an Author.
Your username is: %%%%%%
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/CONBUILDMAT/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

M Ohtsu
Regional Editor
Construction & Building Materials

Reviewers' comments:

The research is conducted on the strain-rate effect of sulfar-damaged concrete. Without good discussion, the paper looses the research significance. In addition, the following corrections are to be made prior to peer review.
1. On page 2 reference is made to Dongming Yan as well as Forquin and Safa - should these contributors not be referenced by way of number?
2. Page 2 - 2nd paragraph - line 2 - reference is made to "bearing more or less durability failure" - do you mean "resulting in durability failure"?
3. On page 3 reference is made to "many structures currently in service will unavoidably suffer from sulphate attack".  Why is this the case?  Were not sulphate resisting cements available and were they not specified for use?
4. Conclusion 4 could be usefully expanded on justifying studying the sulphate phenomenon at higher strain rates and linking it to relevance in practice.  In addition what is the likely engineering benefit of strain rate sensitivity being improved by sulphate attack?

回复此楼