应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 这样的审稿意见，我的文章怎么发呢？
51/1返回列表
查看: 1823  |  回复: 22
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

aleilei

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 这样的审稿意见，我的文章怎么发呢？

去年审稿意见回来了，当时我就震惊了，也有点灰心。。。。。
    今年还是得收拾，请大家帮我看看这个审稿意见. 我想继续发这个档次的有点问题，发低一点的行不？现在也不可能补实验了，只能在写法上修改了。

   Dear Dr.,

Thank you very much for submitting your above-mentioned manuscript for review to ####. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet one or several of our criteria and must be rejected for publication.

Specifically, I agree with the reviewer that the results you present are too preliminary to warrant publication at this stage.

Unfortunately, due to the concerns described above, we cannot accept a revised version of your manuscript. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,

.........................................................................................

Reviewers' comments:

Much is needed to be improved for this study before ready for manuscript review.

First, as it is written as a methods development, at least one target gene needs to be illustrate. There are no details on methodology either.

Throughout the manuscript, there is not description of this gene? There is one published paper on this, another one referred to as submitted to Plos1.  What is this gene? It is up to the author to explain, not the reviewer to find out through references.

Why only 2 out of 6  used were effective? There is no explanation at all.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2011-03-09 16:03:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lirw

木虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖
唯一的办法就是转投啦
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
23楼2011-08-05 11:41:27
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
aleilei(金币+1): 谢谢 2011-03-09 16:34:00
祝福祝福~~~祝福祝福~~~
回复此楼
2楼2011-03-09 16:09:59
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
aleilei(金币+1): 恩，谢谢 2011-03-09 16:34:16
"the results you present are too preliminary to warrant publication at this stage"
真的这样的话，的确很难发，即使降低档次。不过找找看，有没有杂志发过类似不成熟的文章。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2011-03-09 16:14:09
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aleilei

金虫 (正式写手)
我是做植物方向的，上次投的是4以上的，现在想投FEBS letter 或者PLANTA，哪一个更快，又不计较工作量的？
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2011-03-09 16:35:48
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭