| 查看: 856 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
请教大家,我应该如何回复编辑? 肯请大家指点。
|
|||
|
Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper is well revised. The topic about **** is very interesting and meaningful, but it still needs some modifications: (1) Avoid question title in technical paper. (2) In section 2.1(line 58), the mineral filler used should be limestone powder instead of calcium carbonate. (3) In section 2.3(line 89), why the dimension of specimens is determined at 250 × 30 × 25 in B test? (4) As far as I concerned, the results of B usually have a big error, please provide more information about error analysis (5) Numerous tests on correlation between A test results and C index are suggested. If the C index can take place of TSRST test results? Reviewer #2: The paper addresses a very important topic and, although the English used is sometimes confusing, it is easy to read and understand. Unfortunately, from the scientific point of view, it is difficult to evaluate the paper since very few details are provided on how experiments were run and how analyses were performed For example, the authors reference some Chinese test methods and provide no details on how the tests were performed. In terms of analyses, apart from simple statistics, there is a one sentence mention of grey analysis without any further details. The authors are referencing documents that can not be accessed and provide only one or two old references from more accessible references although there are many more other references in the subject area . I also have a problem when no equation is provided in a manuscript for a scientific journal . 上面是评审意见。 请问,Reviewer #1的第5点意见是什么意思呢? Reviewer #2的意见能否帮助翻译一下吗? 我的翻译如下(大概意思): 试验方法及分析方法说的不够详细。如中国规范中的方法应该介绍一下。此外,除了一些简单的统计分析,文中提到了灰关联分析,但没有任何的详细信息(是让我对这方法简要的介绍一下吗?)。 作者参考了一些他们搜索不到的文献(可能是有一些是国内的期刊它们搜不到,还有一些是国内的研究报告。研究报告我想他们肯定是搜不到吧,我应该怎么办呢?)。尽管在他们能搜索到的文献中有很多相关文献,但作者只参考了他们能查得到的、很少、很古老的文献。此外,在科技论文中,可以没有公式吗?(是希望我在论文中提供一些公式吗?) 肯请大家指点! [ Last edited by RoseAndy on 2011-2-25 at 20:17 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯,如何抉择
已经有5人回复
课题组会帮你通过考核么?
已经有6人回复
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了,离AI做有机合成还有多远?
已经有7人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
2026年人文教育与社会发展国际会议(HESD 2026)
+1/856
深圳|91年IT研发,期待一份不必伪装的长久陪伴。
+5/405
深圳|91年IT研发,期待一份不必伪装的长久陪伴
+5/390
中国农大 课题组招收2027年9月入学的考核制博士生
+5/130
[Sensors] 特刊征稿
+1/95
沈阳工业大学 环境电化学技术研究团队 招收硕士研究生(学硕/专硕)
+2/76
中国科大-合肥国家实验室冷原子量子网络团队招聘启事
+2/72
[Mathematics] 特刊征稿
+1/44
[Complex & Intelligent Systems] 专刊征稿
+1/43
爱丁顿实验
+1/33
高分辨质谱测试丨科研单位对外服务
+1/20
蛋白翻译后修饰:解码细胞功能调控的分子密码
+1/5
生物发酵罐气体智能管控,层流质量流量控制器如何赋能?
+1/5
委托检验的安全锁:质量保证协议,你签了吗?
+1/3
ICoEP(教育与心理学国际会议)
+1/2
ICoAAD(建筑、艺术与设计)
+1/2
仪器验证全生命周期管理:检测数据精准与否的前提
+1/2
细胞检定样品,您用对了吗?
+1/2
单细胞VDJ测序:从B细胞库中精准挖掘抗体药优势克隆
+1/1
CAHSS(艺术、人文与社会科学国际会议)
+1/1
3楼2011-02-25 20:21:11
2楼2011-02-25 20:17:07
4楼2011-02-25 22:23:06










回复此楼