24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

RoseAndy

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 212.1
帖子: 406
在线: 140小时
虫号: 652801

[交流] 请教大家，我应该如何回复编辑？肯请大家指点。

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: This paper is well revised. The topic about **** is very interesting and meaningful, but it still needs some modifications:
(1) Avoid question title in technical paper.
(2) In section 2.1(line 58), the mineral filler used should be limestone powder instead of calcium carbonate.
(3) In section 2.3(line 89), why the dimension of specimens is determined at 250 × 30 × 25 in B test?
(4) As far as I concerned, the results of B usually have a big error, please provide more information about error analysis
(5) Numerous tests on correlation between A test results and C index are suggested. If the C index can take place of TSRST test results?

Reviewer #2: The paper addresses a very important topic and, although the English used is sometimes confusing, it is easy to read and understand.
Unfortunately, from the scientific point of view, it is difficult to evaluate the paper since very few details are provided on how experiments were run and how analyses were performed
For example, the authors reference some Chinese test methods and provide no details on how the tests were performed. In terms of analyses, apart from simple statistics, there is a one sentence mention of grey analysis without any further details.
The authors are referencing documents that can not be accessed and provide only one or two old references from more accessible references although there are many more other references in the subject area . I also have a problem when no equation is provided in a manuscript for a scientific journal .

上面是评审意见。请问，Reviewer #1的第5点意见是什么意思呢？

Reviewer #2的意见能否帮助翻译一下吗？我的翻译如下（大概意思）：

试验方法及分析方法说的不够详细。如中国规范中的方法应该介绍一下。此外，除了一些简单的统计分析，文中提到了灰关联分析，但没有任何的详细信息（是让我对这方法简要的介绍一下吗？）。
作者参考了一些他们搜索不到的文献（可能是有一些是国内的期刊它们搜不到，还有一些是国内的研究报告。研究报告我想他们肯定是搜不到吧，我应该怎么办呢？）。尽管在他们能搜索到的文献中有很多相关文献，但作者只参考了他们能查得到的、很少、很古老的文献。此外，在科技论文中，可以没有公式吗？（是希望我在论文中提供一些公式吗？）

肯请大家指点！

[ Last edited by RoseAndy on 2011-2-25 at 20:17 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有19人回复
职称评审没过，求安慰已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-02-25 20:04:52

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

RoseAndy

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 212.1
帖子: 406
在线: 140小时
虫号: 652801

引用回帖:

Originally posted by jlu_w at 2011-02-25 20:17:07:
不是相关专业能否这样理解？
关于A test和Cindex的相关问题已经有了很多说明了，C index能否替代 TSRST test
的结果？
审稿人2 是嫌你引用了太多中文文献吧，还有一些比较老的文献，这个的确不应该！还有实 ...

关于A test和Cindex的相关问题已经有了很多说明了
你的意思是说已经有很多文献在讨论这个问题了？