| 查看: 855 | 回复: 3 | ||
[交流]
请教大家,我应该如何回复编辑? 肯请大家指点。
|
|
Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper is well revised. The topic about **** is very interesting and meaningful, but it still needs some modifications: (1) Avoid question title in technical paper. (2) In section 2.1(line 58), the mineral filler used should be limestone powder instead of calcium carbonate. (3) In section 2.3(line 89), why the dimension of specimens is determined at 250 × 30 × 25 in B test? (4) As far as I concerned, the results of B usually have a big error, please provide more information about error analysis (5) Numerous tests on correlation between A test results and C index are suggested. If the C index can take place of TSRST test results? Reviewer #2: The paper addresses a very important topic and, although the English used is sometimes confusing, it is easy to read and understand. Unfortunately, from the scientific point of view, it is difficult to evaluate the paper since very few details are provided on how experiments were run and how analyses were performed For example, the authors reference some Chinese test methods and provide no details on how the tests were performed. In terms of analyses, apart from simple statistics, there is a one sentence mention of grey analysis without any further details. The authors are referencing documents that can not be accessed and provide only one or two old references from more accessible references although there are many more other references in the subject area . I also have a problem when no equation is provided in a manuscript for a scientific journal . 上面是评审意见。 请问,Reviewer #1的第5点意见是什么意思呢? Reviewer #2的意见能否帮助翻译一下吗? 我的翻译如下(大概意思): 试验方法及分析方法说的不够详细。如中国规范中的方法应该介绍一下。此外,除了一些简单的统计分析,文中提到了灰关联分析,但没有任何的详细信息(是让我对这方法简要的介绍一下吗?)。 作者参考了一些他们搜索不到的文献(可能是有一些是国内的期刊它们搜不到,还有一些是国内的研究报告。研究报告我想他们肯定是搜不到吧,我应该怎么办呢?)。尽管在他们能搜索到的文献中有很多相关文献,但作者只参考了他们能查得到的、很少、很古老的文献。此外,在科技论文中,可以没有公式吗?(是希望我在论文中提供一些公式吗?) 肯请大家指点! [ Last edited by RoseAndy on 2011-2-25 at 20:17 ] |
2楼2011-02-25 20:17:07
3楼2011-02-25 20:21:11
4楼2011-02-25 22:23:06










回复此楼