| 查看: 3926 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！ 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
审稿96天被拒，编辑的意思是： I am the manging editor in charge of your submission. Your paper was sent to two referees who have worked extensively on this topic. Both have now responded. As you can see from the reports, both referees felt that the paper is not rigorously written and it looks more like notes for an article than a completed paper. While Referee 1 is a little more positive, Referee 2 recommended rejection. As a result of this, I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to publish your paper. 主编所说的第一个审稿人 This paper is potentially interesting for the readers of XXXXXXXXXXX because it contains some original research. However, I have comments on five major points that I think should be clarified or improved in order to better understand the messages from the paper, namely: 1) highlighting the originality of the research; 2) the clearness of the presented methodology; 3) the data sources used for the empirical analysis; 4) the very poor quality of citations and references; 5) the quality of the English used in the paper. 这个审稿人所提的问题大多比较容易解决，后面还有大概两页的审稿意见，这里不多累述，感觉好像没有直接把我拒了。 第二个审稿人只给了短短一页的意见： This is an applied piece of research that tries to measure XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, and make comparisons with other XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. To some extent, the paper is still at a preliminary stage, in what refers to the presentation and explanation of the results. On the one hand, the authors refer to different XXXXXXXXXXXXXX measurement proposals (which are not new to this paper and are not used in this paper) that are presented in a not rigorous way: - They do not use a homogeneous nomenclature when they present different “models of XXXXXXXXXX” - They give expressions for a continuous and a discrete variable in an unspecified way. - Some expressions for XXXXXXXXXXXX are not correct. - They designate XXXXXXXXXX as Di(x), where i refers to AAAAA and x to BBBBBBBBBB should not appear none of them. - They state that “the relation between AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA and BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB is like “S” shape” without stating any reference…. From the beginning the authors talk about the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX without giving any intuition of the concept until its definition in page 6. The authors should make an effort to provide the motivation of the study of XXXXXXXXXXXXX and to improve the discussion of the results, as it is very cursory in its current version. Finally, the articles mentioned through the text are not correctly referenced. In many cases the name of the author is referred together with the surname 麻烦大家帮我看一下编辑以及审稿人的态度。这篇文章花了我很多心血，我搞不清楚按审稿人意思修改以后重投还有没有希望。还应不应该投这个杂志..... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申博发邮件
已经有9人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有9人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有7人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有8人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有8人回复
11楼2011-02-11 19:11:19
jlu_w
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4077.9
- 散金: 1696
- 红花: 1
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 629
- 在线: 233.5小时
- 虫号: 1007700
- 注册: 2010-04-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体光电子器件
2楼2011-02-11 13:39:37
3楼2011-02-11 13:43:38
jlu_w
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4077.9
- 散金: 1696
- 红花: 1
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 629
- 在线: 233.5小时
- 虫号: 1007700
- 注册: 2010-04-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体光电子器件
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
两个审稿人都提出你的研究停留在初级阶段，头一个审稿人说的客气些，觉得有潜在的讨论价值，就是说如果写的好可以接受。后一个直接指出你的讨论不够深刻，最后还说The authors should make an effort to provide the motivation of the study of XXXX and to improve the discussion of the results, as it is very。。。 个人觉得还是换一个期刊吧，编辑很少有不赞同审稿人的。另外现在的期刊很注重理论支持之下，讨论的创新和深入，文章怎么写还是很难的。。。好好看看第二个审稿人的意见，再看几篇文献，如果能前面指出很好的应用前景，后面独到的深入讨论一下原理性的东西，下次就能高中啦，祝福楼主！ |
4楼2011-02-11 14:27:59