| 查看: 1070 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
luozh72专家顾问
|
[交流]
投Chem Eng Sci审稿意见如下,咨询大家是否需要重投?谢谢!
|
||
|
两个审稿人,第一个审稿人小修,问题都很好回答.第二个审稿人,所问也觉得好回答.最终拒稿.所有意见如下.麻烦大家帮忙参考一下,是否接审稿意见修改重投该期刊并写一封反驳信还是改投它刊? Dear Dr. ----, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Chemical Engineering Science. Your paper, referenced above, has been reviewed by experts in the field. Based on the comments of these reviewers, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in Chemical Engineering Science. The comments of the reviewers are included below in order for you to understand the basis for our decision, and we hope that their thoughtful comments will help you in your future studies. I draw your attention, in particular, to the comments of Reviewer 2, who is an expert in reactor modeling. While you may be disappointed by this decision, I would like to urge you to continue to consider Chemical Engineering Science for publication of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Alex T. Bell Chairman of the Board of Editors Chemical Engineering Science Chemical Engineering Science, Editorial Office E-mail: chemicales@elsevier.com Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: ----- I recommend this paper to be published after minor revision. Reviewer #2: The authors present a simulation study of the reaction of CO and ethyl nitrate to diethyl oxalate. The essence of the paper is to present a two-dimensional model in which side reactions are included. Previous work used a one-dimensional model with side reactions and a two-dimensional model without side reactions. In addition, a validation study is included using literature data. The model presented is standard, and the suthors have simplified it with many assumptions, for which no justification is given. the kinetics are taken from the literature, where the authors' "exponent-function" means "power-law" - the usual kinetics with Arrhenius temperature dependence. Parts of the model seem strange - in particular equation 25 must be wrong - they set dT/dz = c1 dT/dr at r = D/2? This is mathematically incorrect. In their conclusions the authors mention that the results are obvious - I agree. It is hard to see what the contribution is here, the methods used are old, and I get no confidence from the paper that they have been implemented correctly or that the simplifications made are reasonable. I would not accept this paper. 本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2845813&fpage=1 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
342求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料与化工调剂一志愿大连海事085600，349
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿武理材料工程302调剂环化或化工
已经有16人回复
-
311求调剂一志愿合肥工业大学
已经有12人回复
-
环境工程调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288求调剂 一志愿哈工大 材料与化工
已经有22人回复
-
085600，321分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿 南京航空航天大学 ，080500材料科学与工程学硕
已经有11人回复
-
土木304求调剂
已经有3人回复
关键先生
主管区长
学霸
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7037.3
- 散金: 208
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 901
- 在线: 164.8小时
- 虫号: 140930
- 注册: 2005-12-20
- 专业: 化工系统工程
5楼2011-07-11 10:06:55
ziyeweng
版主
- 应助: 78 (初中生)
- 金币: 12705.7
- 散金: 5
- 红花: 100
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1478
- 在线: 820.2小时
- 虫号: 898876
- 注册: 2009-11-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
4楼2011-02-10 16:31:16
130