| 查看: 1020 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
luozh72金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
投Chem Eng Sci审稿意见如下,咨询大家是否需要重投?谢谢!
|
||
|
两个审稿人,第一个审稿人小修,问题都很好回答.第二个审稿人,所问也觉得好回答.最终拒稿.所有意见如下.麻烦大家帮忙参考一下,是否接审稿意见修改重投该期刊并写一封反驳信还是改投它刊? Dear Dr. ----, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Chemical Engineering Science. Your paper, referenced above, has been reviewed by experts in the field. Based on the comments of these reviewers, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in Chemical Engineering Science. The comments of the reviewers are included below in order for you to understand the basis for our decision, and we hope that their thoughtful comments will help you in your future studies. I draw your attention, in particular, to the comments of Reviewer 2, who is an expert in reactor modeling. While you may be disappointed by this decision, I would like to urge you to continue to consider Chemical Engineering Science for publication of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Alex T. Bell Chairman of the Board of Editors Chemical Engineering Science Chemical Engineering Science, Editorial Office E-mail: chemicales@elsevier.com Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: ----- I recommend this paper to be published after minor revision. Reviewer #2: The authors present a simulation study of the reaction of CO and ethyl nitrate to diethyl oxalate. The essence of the paper is to present a two-dimensional model in which side reactions are included. Previous work used a one-dimensional model with side reactions and a two-dimensional model without side reactions. In addition, a validation study is included using literature data. The model presented is standard, and the suthors have simplified it with many assumptions, for which no justification is given. the kinetics are taken from the literature, where the authors' "exponent-function" means "power-law" - the usual kinetics with Arrhenius temperature dependence. Parts of the model seem strange - in particular equation 25 must be wrong - they set dT/dz = c1 dT/dr at r = D/2? This is mathematically incorrect. In their conclusions the authors mention that the results are obvious - I agree. It is hard to see what the contribution is here, the methods used are old, and I get no confidence from the paper that they have been implemented correctly or that the simplifications made are reasonable. I would not accept this paper. 本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2845813&fpage=1 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复