| ²é¿´: 1453 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||||
[½»Á÷]
´óÐÞºó»Ø¸´±à¼
|
| ÎÒµÄÎÄÕ´óÐÞ£¬ÇëÎÊÐÞ¸ÄÍêÖ®ºóÔõô»Ø¸´±à¼£¬ÔÚword ÖУ¬µ«ÎÒÏëÎʵÄÊÇÓïÑÔ·½ÃæÔõô´ë´Ç£¬ÇëÎʳæÓÑÓÐûÓÐÄ£°å¹©²Î¿¼£¿£¿£¿Ð»ÁË¡£ |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
¼Ç¼ƬÊÕ²Ø | SCIµÈÂÛÎÄ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
288Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ071005
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ£¬ÉúÎïѧ£¬301·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
0856µ÷¼Á£¬ÊÇѧУ¾ÍÈ¥
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0817 »¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì 299·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á ÓпÆÑоÀú ÓжþÇøÎÄÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Áº³ÉΰÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×é»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á £¬Áù¼¶Òѹý£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¶«»ªÀí¹¤´óѧ»¯²Äרҵ26½ì˶ʿ²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
´óÐÞºó ±à¼ÔÙÌáÎʺó decision in process µÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
´óÐÞºó·µ»ØÐ޸ĸ壬ÊÕµ½±à¼Ò»·âÐÅ£¨¸½ÐżþÄÚÈÝ£©£¬ÊÇ×¼±¸¾Ü¸åÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
´óÐÞÖ®ºóÈçºÎ»Ø¸´±à¼
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åCarbohydrate Polymers ÔÓÖ¾½ÓÊܺ󣬱༵Ļظ´
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ´óÐÞºóÒ»°ã¼¸ÌìÐ޻أ¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
СµÜµÚÒ»´ÎͶ¸å£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´±à¼£¨´óÐÞ£©£¡Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
´óÐÞºóunder reviewµÚ21Ìì
ÒѾÓÐ46È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄ´óÐÞºóÍâÉóÈý¸öÔ£¬Ôõô°ì
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ͶMacromolecular Chemistry and Physics ±à¼»Ø¸´ÔÝʱ½ÓÊܵ«ÊÇÒª´óÐÞÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
´óÐÞºóû¸øÐ޸Ļú»á£¬ÆøÈË£¡
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
Ó¢ÎÄÎÄÕ´óÐÞºóÈçºÎͶ¸å
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Á½´Î´óÐÞºó»¹ÊÇ´óÐÞ£¬µ«ÊÇû¸ø³öÈκÎÒâ¼û£¬Ôõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
polymer engineering and science ´óÐÞºóÆí¸£
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
³ÖÐø´´ÒµÕߣ¬A8ÀëÒìÄÐÕ÷»é£¬ÊÂÒµÓöµ½Æ¿¾±£¬Ñ°ÕÒ´´ÒµÉú»î°éÂÂ
+1/472
ÄϾ©Ò½¿Æ´óѧÉúֳҽѧÓë×Ó´ú½¡¿µ¹úÖØÊµÑéÊÒ-¶·Éºê¿ÎÌâ×é-ѧÊõ˶ʿÕÐÉú
+1/95
ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬¶¯Îïҽѧרҵ
+1/90
´ºÌì¾Í¸Ã¹ä³Ô¹ä³Ô
+1/88
¡¾´úÈË·¢ÌûÎðÕ¾ÄÚÐÅ¡¿¡¾³É¶¼Õ÷ÄÐÓÑ¡¿89Äêδ»é²©Ê¿Æ¯ÁÁÅ®º¢
+1/69
2026ÄêÖØÇ칤ÉÌ´óѧ¹ÜÀí¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³ÌרҵѧÊõ˶ʿÕÐÉúµ÷¼Á£¬·ç¾°×ÜÔÚÁø°µ»¨Ã÷´¦
+1/35
ҽѧ327·Öר˶µ÷¼Á
+1/16
Çൺ¿Æ¼¼´óѧ»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÔºÊ¿ÍŶÓ2026ÄêÄâÕÐÊÕÈ«ÈÕÖÆ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú1Ãû
+1/13
¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧÕÐÊÕ2026Ä꺣Ñó¿ÆÑ§Ë¶Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/7
ÄϾ©ÁÖÒµ´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌѧԺ°ØÐÊ·å¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026ÄêÉêÇ뿼ºËÖÆ²©Ê¿2Ãû
+1/6
º£ÍⲩʿÕÐÆ¸
+1/6
26ÄêÉ격×Ô¼ö-¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õ
+1/5
211/˫һÁ÷ʯºÓ×Ó´óѧ»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº--µç´ß»¯£¬CO2ת»¯
+1/5
2026¿¼ÑеÄͬѧ£¬·ÖÊý²»¹»£¿Ïëµ÷¼ÁÉϰ¶µÄͬѧ£¬À´¿´
+1/4
»¶Ó¼ÓÈë¸ÓÄÏʦ·¶´óѧÏȽø¹âµç×ÓÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ
+1/4
ÂÛÎÄͶ³ö£¬Æí¸££¬ÇóºÃÔË
+1/2
¡¾µÚÈýÂÖÕÐÉú£¬31ºÅ½ØÖ¹¡¿°Ä¿Æ´ó³ÏÕÐ2026ÇïÈ«½±²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú£¨ÄÉÃ×ҽѧ/ÉúÎï²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò£©
+1/1
Ê×´ÎÕÐÊÕ×ʸñ£¬ÕÐÊÕ¹¤¿Æµ÷¼Á£¡
+1/1
Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧÉúÃüѧԺÖÇÄÜ»¯ÕïÁÆ×°±¸Ñо¿ÖÐÐÄ2026Ä격ʿÉúÕÐÉú
+1/1
±±º½¹úÐÂԺ֣ˬ½ÌÊÚ2026ÄêÕÐÉúÕÐÆ¸£¨½À×ԺʿÍŶÓ/·ÂÉú½çÃæ²ÄÁÏÈ«¹úÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ£©
+1/1
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345467
- Ìû×Ó: 127554
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
kouhuanhuan(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
kouhuanhuan(½ð±Ò+3): 2011-01-21 14:21:41
zhenghaiw(½ð±Ò+2): ¸ÐлÄúÈÈÇéµÄ½â´ð 2011-01-21 14:56:52
kouhuanhuan(½ð±Ò+1):лл²ÎÓë
kouhuanhuan(½ð±Ò+3): 2011-01-21 14:21:41
zhenghaiw(½ð±Ò+2): ¸ÐлÄúÈÈÇéµÄ½â´ð 2011-01-21 14:56:52
|
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers¡¯ comments concerning our manuscript entitled ¡°Paper Title¡± (ID: ÎÄÕ¸åºÅ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á 2. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ ÖðÌõÒâ¼û»Ø´ð£¬ÇмÉÒ»¶¨²»ÄÜÓÐÒÅ©Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÎÊÌâÓÐÏÂÁм¸¸öÀñòÊõÓï¿ÉÊʵ±ÓÃÓãºWe are very sorry for our negligence of ¡¡...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ¡¡...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that¡¡We have made correction according to the Reviewer¡¯s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer¡¯s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that¡¡Considering the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion, we have ¡¡×îºóÌØÒâ¸ÐлһÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£ºSpecial thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: ͬÉÏÊö Reviewer #3: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of ¡°¡¡¡± were corrected as ¡°¡¡¡¡¡±2. Line 107, ¡°¡¡¡± was added 3. Line 129, ¡°¡¡¡± was deleted ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers¡¯ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. [ Last edited by paperhunter on 2011-1-21 at 13:55 ] |
2Â¥2011-01-21 13:53:41
3Â¥2011-01-21 16:44:49
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ˳±ãÎÊÒ»¾ä£¬»Ø¸´ÊÇÓÃword¸½¼þ»¹ÊÇÖ±½ÓÕ³ÔÚemailÀïÃæ£¿ |
4Â¥2011-01-21 16:46:56
caclo
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 32 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.001
- ½ð±Ò: 4809.6
- Ìû×Ó: 1109
- ÔÚÏß: 526.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 745497
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
»Ø¸´Ö±½ÓÔÚresponse letterÀïÃæ°¡£¬²»ÓÃÁíÍâµ¥¶À·¢Óʼþ¡£ |
5Â¥2011-01-22 02:03:21













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥