24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

kouhuanhuan

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3108.6
帖子: 127
在线: 156.8小时
虫号: 860734

[交流] 大修后回复编辑

我的文章大修，请问修改完之后怎么回复编辑，在word 中，但我想问的是语言方面怎么措辞，请问虫友有没有模板供参考？？？谢了。

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

记录片收藏

SCI等论文

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

大修后编辑再提问后 decision in process 的问题已经有9人回复
大修后返回修改稿，收到编辑一封信（附信件内容），是准备拒稿吗？已经有17人回复
大修之后如何回复编辑已经有6人回复
投稿Carbohydrate Polymers 杂志接受后，编辑的回复已经有12人回复
文章大修后一般几天修回？已经有18人回复
小弟第一次投稿，如何回复编辑（大修）！谢谢！已经有11人回复
大修后under review第21天已经有46人回复
论文大修后外审三个月，怎么办已经有11人回复
投Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 编辑回复暂时接受但是要大修是什么意思？已经有5人回复
大修后没给修改机会，气人！已经有22人回复
英文文章大修后如何投稿已经有4人回复
两次大修后还是大修，但是没给出任何意见，怎么办？已经有11人回复
polymer engineering and science 大修后祈福已经有19人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-01-21 13:51:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

★ ★ ★
kouhuanhuan(金币+1):谢谢参与
kouhuanhuan(金币+3): 2011-01-21 14:21:41
zhenghaiw(金币+2): 感谢您热情的解答 2011-01-21 14:56:52

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××。。。。。。
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2: 同上述
Reviewer #3: ××××××
Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

[ Last edited by paperhunter on 2011-1-21 at 13:55 ]