24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3786)
>文献求助 (354)
>导师招生 (332)
>虫友互识 (329)
>休闲灌水 (100)
>论文投稿 (83)
>招聘信息布告栏 (82)
>硕博家园 (78)
>博后之家 (76)
>考博 (73)
>催化 (54)
>公派出国 (53)
>考研 (45)
>基金申请 (44)
>论文道贺祈福 (41)
>教师之家 (35)

返回列表

kouhuanhuan

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3108.6
帖子: 127
在线: 156.8小时
虫号: 860734

[交流] 大修后回复编辑

我的文章大修，请问修改完之后怎么回复编辑，在word 中，但我想问的是语言方面怎么措辞，请问虫友有没有模板供参考？？？谢了。

回复此楼

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-01-21 13:51:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

★ ★ ★
kouhuanhuan(金币+1):谢谢参与
kouhuanhuan(金币+3): 2011-01-21 14:21:41
zhenghaiw(金币+2): 感谢您热情的解答 2011-01-21 14:56:52

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××。。。。。。
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2: 同上述
Reviewer #3: ××××××
Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

[ Last edited by paperhunter on 2011-1-21 at 13:55 ]