| 查看: 1559 | 回复: 6 | |||
[交流]
ChemComm悲剧 已有5人参与
|
| CC投稿1月有半，等来消息，两个审稿人意见不一，经仲裁，拒稿！哎，不容易啊。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有14人回复
-
论文的挂名怎么评判贡献？基金申请中，排名第一的挂名文章
已经有3人回复
-
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
闲聊
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有4人回复
2楼2011-01-17 21:22:28
3楼2011-01-17 21:42:38
|
下午收到的消息 Thank you for your submission to ChemComm. I have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below. The initial referees did not give agreeing recommendations and so an adjudicative referee was consulted. After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in ChemComm. Based on the reports we have received, the referees have indicated that the work does not represent a significant enough advance over work already published and is therefore of insufficient significance and impact to warrant urgent publication in a general chemistry journal. I would encourage you to submit the work to a more specialised journal after addressing the comments of the referees. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports. Please note that the acceptance rate for ChemComm is <35% of submitted manuscripts. Criteria for acceptance in ChemComm are that work should be original and significant, and of wide general appeal or exceptional interest in its specialised area. I am sorry not to have better news for you and I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Yours sincerely, Anna Watson Dr Anna Watson AMRSC Publishing Editor ChemComm Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF Tel +44 (0)1223 432474 Fax +44 (0)1223 420247 |
4楼2011-01-17 22:03:14
5楼2011-01-17 22:08:12
joymyself2006
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 283.8
- 散金: 642
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 754
- 在线: 69小时
- 虫号: 234668
- 注册: 2006-03-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能与智能高分子
6楼2011-01-17 22:12:30
 |
7楼2011-01-17 22:44:57