| 查看: 1334 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ChemComm悲剧 已有5人参与
|
|||
| CC投稿1月有半，等来消息，两个审稿人意见不一，经仲裁，拒稿！哎，不容易啊。。。。。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
081700，311，求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
081700学硕，323分，一志愿中国海洋大学求调剂学校
已经有17人回复
-
085600材料与化工301分求调剂院校
已经有21人回复
-
化工学硕 285求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703调剂
已经有18人回复
-
0702物理学学硕299求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
304求调剂（085602，过四级，一志愿985）
已经有19人回复
-
085600材料与化工专硕329 求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
生物与医药273求调剂
已经有10人回复
|
下午收到的消息 Thank you for your submission to ChemComm. I have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below. The initial referees did not give agreeing recommendations and so an adjudicative referee was consulted. After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in ChemComm. Based on the reports we have received, the referees have indicated that the work does not represent a significant enough advance over work already published and is therefore of insufficient significance and impact to warrant urgent publication in a general chemistry journal. I would encourage you to submit the work to a more specialised journal after addressing the comments of the referees. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports. Please note that the acceptance rate for ChemComm is <35% of submitted manuscripts. Criteria for acceptance in ChemComm are that work should be original and significant, and of wide general appeal or exceptional interest in its specialised area. I am sorry not to have better news for you and I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Yours sincerely, Anna Watson Dr Anna Watson AMRSC Publishing Editor ChemComm Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WF Tel +44 (0)1223 432474 Fax +44 (0)1223 420247 |
4楼2011-01-17 22:03:14
2楼2011-01-17 21:22:28
3楼2011-01-17 21:42:38
5楼2011-01-17 22:08:12
