| 查看: 483 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
ISSUE 144,盼砖头
|
|||
|
ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc. The author of this statement contends that artist but critic can give society something of lasting value.As to me,I agree with viewpoint positively as a whole. As is often said by my father, who is a famous artist of purple artwork, and I paraphrase-"The true value of each artwork is an expression of the artist's imagination and inspiration. When someone tries to understand and appreciate the value of artwork, an interaction between heart of the artist and public happens”. Art is a vivid expression of the heart of artist, and its lasting value can not be detracted or exaggerated by others, such as critics and so on. Even if there are some cases when people misunderstand the value of the artwork, time will be the most honest judge and any mislead toward artwork will go away disappear at last. Additionally, critic’s job is to evaluate the artwork, and can not affect the lasting value of artwork in the long run. Take Vandal for example, his abstract fainting were severely criticized by the critics at his time because his fresh can not be accepted by the majorities. Even before he was dead, his talents still can not been appreciated by the public.While, as is the old saying-true true gold can not fear fire, the value of his paintings finally won worldwide praise after hundreds of years. We, humans, always have a limited understanding toward others' ideas, but the true value of artwork will always be appreciated due to an increase in percipience and knowledge. However, some important aspects of critics can not be ignored, especially in their contributions in helping people understand the value of artist. Critic is somewhat like a bridge between the common people and artist. Art is a fresh thought of the artist, which can not be easily understood by public. It is common sense that we understand most of the artworks through critics, and the public tend to take the famous critic's words for sure. All in all, the eternal value of artwork is originated from the artist, not from the critic. However, critic does help people understand the lasting value sometimes. 感觉题名难写，望高手帮我拓展思路 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
青基如何破局
已经有7人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有6人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
0.5
|
The author of this statement contends that artist but critic can give society something of lasting value. As to me, I agree with viewpoint positively as a whole. 第一段：说了speaker的观点以后，应该稍加分析，然后自然导出你的观点，随后可以写一句话引起下文，也许这样会更好。 另：注意句法上的问题：我觉得句中写成…….that it is artist but not critic……….. 还有as to me ,写成as for me,更好, As is often said by my father, who is a famous artist of purple artwork, and I paraphrase-"The true value of each artwork is an expression of the artist's imagination and inspiration. When someone tries to understand and appreciate the value of artwork, an interaction between heart of the artist and public happens”. Art is a vivid expression of the heart of artist, and its lasting value can not be detracted or exaggerated by others, such as critics and so on. Even if there are some cases when people misunderstand the value of the artwork, time will be the most honest judge and any mislead toward artwork will go away disappear at last. 第二段：在段首可写个中心句，突然间出现个“as is often said……”不好吧，， Additionally, critic’s job is to evaluate the artwork, and can not affect the lasting value of artwork in the long run. Take Vandal for example, his abstract fainting were severely criticized by the critics at his time because his fresh can not be accepted by the majorities. Even before he was dead, his talents still can not been appreciated by the public. While, as is the old saying-true true gold can not fear fire, the value of his paintings finally won worldwide praise after hundreds of years. We, humans, always have a limited understanding toward others' ideas, but the true value of artwork will always be appreciated due to an increase in percipience and knowledge. 第三段的首句似乎是个TOPIC SENTCEN，但是好象你要说的意思已经在第一段的末尾体现出来了--------“时间是检验艺术价值的最好标准”，所以，我看到不如这两段合在一起写。 However, some important aspects of critics can not be ignored, especially in their contributions in helping people understand the value of artist. Critic is somewhat like a bridge between the common people and artist. Art is a fresh thought of the artist, which can not be easily understood by public. It is common sense that we understand most of the artworks through critics, and the public tend to take the famous critic's words for sure. 第四段的首句看起来不错，但是可以似乎经不起推敲，我想你要表达的初衷可能是“有些方面的批评是值得重视的，因为它们能帮助我们更好的理解作品的价值” All in all, the eternal value of artwork is originated from the artist, not from the critic. However, critic does help people understand the lasting value sometimes. 这个IISUE的题目意思表达的是“是谁给了社会更为持久的价值，艺术还是艺术批评”，你的文章里面在第一段表达了你的观点，即“艺术带给了社会更为持久的价值”， 那你后面正文就应该写为什么是这样的，然后展开论述，比如说，首先是艺术创造为社会产生了价值，不管是好还是坏，，然后讲，艺术批评只不过是帮助人们理解艺术的价值，提供一个方法和途径，剔除一些不好的艺术作品，留下真正的精品，最后再退步讲一下当然什么什么，，然后来个总结段之类的。以上是个人观点，供参考。加油啊！ |
2楼2006-07-21 17:26:52
3楼2006-07-21 20:27:59
可可西里
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
甾体者说
- 应助: 170 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.271
- 金币: 71624.6
- 散金: 1291
- 红花: 150
- 沙发: 35
- 帖子: 58413
- 在线: 2274.7小时
- 虫号: 244935
- 注册: 2006-04-22
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 天体中基本物理过程的理论
4楼2006-07-22 10:10:11
投票:
10