| 查看: 4964 | 回复: 15 | |||
starared禁虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Elsvier Required Reviews Completed后状态变为Decision in process 正常吗? 已有9人参与
|
||
| Elsvier Required Reviews Completed后状态变为Decision in process 。不知道 Decision in process 是Required Reviews Completed后的正常程序?还是Required Reviews Completed后正常先进入退修再进入Decision in process ? |
» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有18人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
论文状态从Required Reviews Completed变成Decision in Process了。非常焦急等到结果
已经有440人回复
再谈Required Reviews Completed 这个状态,不是审稿已经完成(及催稿时间)。
已经有48人回复
一个IF近3的Elsvier杂志Required Reviews Completed 都一周了,还没动静啊。
已经有30人回复
文章状态变成Required Reviews Completed,是不是审稿完毕了啊?
已经有16人回复
materials letters 期刊投稿中,3周后投稿状态变成了Required Reviews Completed
已经有15人回复
《Food Hydrocolloids》状态变为required reviews completed已持续两周
已经有14人回复
required reviews completed 催稿信后状态时间更新是什么原因啊
已经有13人回复
Required reviews completed状态一般要持续多久?
已经有7人回复
Required reviews completed 到decision in process才半天是不是杯具了
已经有12人回复
Required Reviews Completed
已经有21人回复
MSEA的状态“ Required Reviews Completed ”请教
已经有6人回复
Elsvier一般Required Reviews Completed后多长时间收到审稿结果?
已经有20人回复
Required Reviews Completed 是什么状态?
已经有23人回复
SBB 一个月Required Reviews Completed
已经有12人回复
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
9楼2011-01-09 11:32:50
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2011-01-09 09:09:35
3楼2011-01-09 09:30:22
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
4楼2011-01-09 10:02:45
kqp1982
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 41 (小学生)
- 金币: 1617.8
- 散金: 1693
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 1214
- 在线: 484.2小时
- 虫号: 112015
- 注册: 2005-11-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化学工程及工业化学
5楼2011-01-09 10:06:34
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
6楼2011-01-09 11:17:07
liaowb03
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 242 (大学生)
- 金币: 16093.6
- 散金: 2137
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 7310
- 在线: 612.2小时
- 虫号: 144671
- 注册: 2005-12-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 观赏园艺学
7楼2011-01-09 11:18:20
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-

专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345462
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127553
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿

8楼2011-01-09 11:21:04
starared
禁虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在线: 762.4小时
- 虫号: 1137379
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
|
一个审槁人的意见是:The experiment results are valuable and of interest,然后提出存在的几个问题,These factors let the manuscript down rather badly and I recommend that the manuscript requires a major rewrite before being further considered for publication in Analytica Chimica Acta. Specific comments are provided below on sections that will need to be improved. 另一个审槁人的意见是: Due to poor use of English and questionable organisation, it was difficult to understand and make sense of this manuscript, but with perseverance I appreciate what the authors are trying to do and believe they are essentially correct......The above assessment suggests that there will eventually be a worthy published paper, but considerable improvements need to be made before that outcome is reached. 编辑的意见:Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Analytica Chimica Acta.As you can see from the reports of the reviewers, the manuscript is not suited for publication in its present form. Reviewer 2 said "Due to poor use of English and questionable organisation, it was difficult to understand and make sense of this manuscript". It would be necessary to rewrite the whole manuscript and to make all the major changes suggested by the reviewers. Such a revised manuscript will have to go through another round of reviewing. 两个审槁人的具体意见达到7页. 编辑给的修改时间42天.这种情况如何? |
10楼2011-01-11 08:51:20













回复此楼
