24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4960  |  回复: 15

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

[交流] Elsvier Required Reviews Completed后状态变为Decision in process 正常吗? 已有9人参与

Elsvier Required Reviews Completed后状态变为Decision in process 。不知道 Decision in process 是Required Reviews Completed后的正常程序?还是Required Reviews Completed后正常先进入退修再进入Decision in process ?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by paperhunter at 2011-01-09 11:21:04:
Required Reviews Completed 表明所有审稿人都已经返回了审稿意见,Decision in process 表明编辑正在参考审稿专家的意见作出最终的结论,祝楼主好运

谢谢!也祝你一切顺利!
9楼2011-01-09 11:32:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
猪会飞(金币+1):鼓励交流 2011-01-09 14:00:34
编辑做决定,然后再通知你(修改,接收,拒绝)。
2楼2011-01-09 09:09:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)

荣誉版主

本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2011-01-09 09:30:22
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2011-01-09 09:09:35:
编辑做决定,然后再通知你(修改,接收,拒绝)。

谢谢! 一般Decision in process 需要多长时间?
4楼2011-01-09 10:02:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kqp1982

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
通常这种情况你老板可能已经收到接收函或者拒稿信了
5楼2011-01-09 10:06:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by kqp1982 at 2011-01-09 10:06:34:
通常这种情况你老板可能已经收到接收函或者拒稿信了

这可能与通常所说的Decision in process 不一样,可能是required reviews completed后的一个常规程序。老板还没有收到信函。
6楼2011-01-09 11:17:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liaowb03

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
应该很快就有结果了,就这两天吧~!
7楼2011-01-09 11:18:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
Required Reviews Completed 表明所有审稿人都已经返回了审稿意见,Decision in process 表明编辑正在参考审稿专家的意见作出最终的结论,祝楼主好运
咱也是有组织的人了...
8楼2011-01-09 11:21:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)

一个审槁人的意见是:The experiment results are valuable and of interest,然后提出存在的几个问题,These factors let the manuscript down rather badly and I recommend that the manuscript requires a major rewrite before being further considered for publication in Analytica Chimica Acta. Specific comments are provided below on sections that will need to be improved.
另一个审槁人的意见是: Due to poor use of English and questionable organisation, it was difficult to understand and make sense of this manuscript, but with perseverance I appreciate what the authors are trying to do and believe they are essentially correct......The above assessment suggests that there will eventually be a worthy published paper, but considerable improvements need to be made before that outcome is reached.
编辑的意见:Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Analytica Chimica Acta.As you can see from the reports of the reviewers, the manuscript is not suited for publication in its present form. Reviewer 2 said "Due to poor use of English and questionable organisation, it was difficult to understand and make sense of this manuscript". It would be necessary to rewrite the whole manuscript and to make all the major changes suggested by the reviewers. Such a revised manuscript will have to go through another round of reviewing.

两个审槁人的具体意见达到7页.
编辑给的修改时间42天.这种情况如何?
10楼2011-01-11 08:51:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 starared 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见