| 查看: 532 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
hummer荣誉版主 (职业作家)
人美在羽毛，鸟美在心灵
|
[交流]
跟着版主写作文——ISSUE（17）作者hudifeng
|
||
|
由于本文作者现在未能注册，所以暂由hummer代发 题目：ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws." 字数：400 用时：0:45:00 日期：2006-7-12 基本同意，但要理性的对待法律，尊敬法律，不要盲目的抵制“不正义的”法律 1法律有时时候表现出不公正的一面，盲目支持“正义的”法律是不对的 2盲目抵制“不公正”的法律也带来很多不安因素 3理性对待法律 字数400。 The author of this issue held the view that every people in a society should take the responsibility to obey just laws and resist unjust laws,based on the mere fact that Laws can be devided into two parts-just laws and unjust laws.As to me,it is not reasonable to take this viewpoint for granted without carfully taking into some important aspects of law.Thus,I can just agree with the author's view partly as it stands. From the begining of human civilication,there are a lot of laws to help govern the common people in every scoiety.However,no all of the laws stand for the civilian's interest.For example,the governers in the autcratic society tend to use the laws to make use of its citizens,without protecting the right of its people.Even in nowdays,some laws enacted by some gorvernors are aimed at maitaintacing their own interest selfishly.As is reported a few days ago in TNT,a country in Africa has carried out a law to be against its neighboring country,which allows its citizen to fight with the people in neighboring country with no punishment.Due to some reasons,conficts occur regularly between two countries,so both of the citizens hate eath other and take this law of fighting with the neighoring counrtry for justness.Finally,both two countries begin wars against each other.It is obvious to see the unjust side of the law,so how can every individual obey laws blindly? Even if there are some unjust laws,we can not simply resist unjust laws.Nowdays,we can see most of the laws are aimed at protecting its people ,helping make the scoeity harmonious,and ensure its intergrity of its country.Accordingly,as the common people in a scociety,we should respect the law legal system enacted by our country.It is also common sense that the definition of "unjust laws" can be a wrong judgement varying from people to people.The world flagant terroists also take the govenment's law for unjust laws and try to break the law.These people can be seen as "extreamist" for resisting the laws.Thus,we can not simply disobey these "unjust" laws,because the justness of laws my be twisted by yourself or by others. All in all,absolute just laws can hardly exsist,because the human nature have flaws.What we believe or expect is to look for the legal system being improved in the future.Thus,we should treat laws rationally,resprect the law somewhat and put forward those laws that you think are unjust in a rational way. [ Last edited by hummer on 2006-7-12 at 21:26 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
哪位高人中了，把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看，让我长长见识
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有5人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
申请删除本帖
已经有7人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
|
The author of this issue held the view that every people in a society should take the responsibility to obey just laws and resist unjust laws,based on the mere fact that Laws can be devided into two parts-just laws and unjust laws.As to me,it is not reasonable to take this viewpoint for granted without carfully taking into some important aspects of law.Thus,I can just agree with the author's view partly as it stands.<四平八稳的开头，说不上不好更说不上好> From the begining of human civilication,there are a lot of laws to help govern Even if there are some unjust laws,we can not simply resist unjust laws.Nowdays,we can see most of the laws are aimed at protecting its people ,helping make the scoeity<拼写> harmonious,and ensure its intergrity of its country.Accordingly,as the common people in a scociety<拼写>,we should respect the law legal system enacted by our country.It is also common sense that the definition of "unjust laws" can be a wrong judgement varying from people to people.The world flagant<拼写> terroists also take the govenment's law for unjust laws and try to break the law.These people can be seen as "extreamist" for resisting the laws.Thus,we can not simply disobey these "unjust" laws,because the justness of laws my be twisted by yourself or by others. All in all,absolute just laws can hardly exsist,because the human nature have flaws.What we believe or expect is to look for the legal system being improved in the future.Thus,we should treat laws rationally,resprect the law somewhat and put forward those laws that you think are unjust in a rational way.<结尾挺好> <基本掌握ISSUE写法。拼写错误多，望注意。 句式的变化不多，且有些有语法问题。 举例论证应避免就例子说例子，若能展开论述会提高论证的力度。这方面作的还不够。 举例应紧扣段落主题句，直接对主题句起到支持作用，比如第二段的例子这方面就有所欠缺，两国人民依据本国法律相互攻击，不是一个明显的支持段落主题的例子。> |
2楼2006-07-12 23:14:42
投票:
