| ²é¿´: 546 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
jjxytcÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾·ÖÏí¡¿´ó¶àÊýÒÑ·¢±íµÄÑо¿½á¹ûÊÇ´íµÄ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
ÏÂÃæµÄ¼¸ÆªÎÄÕÂÖ¸³ö£¬´ó¶àÊýÒÑ·¢±íµÄÑо¿½á¹ûÊÇ´íµÄ£º Djulbegovic, B., & Hozo, I. (2007). When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable? PLoS Med, 4(2), e26. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. Jeng, M. (2006). Error in statistical tests of error in statistical tests. BMC medical research methodology, 6(1), 45. Lawrence, P. A. (2007). The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology: CB, 17(15), R583-585. Moonesinghe, R., Khoury, M. J., & Janssens, A. C. J. W. (2007). Most Published Research Findings Are False¡ªBut a Little Replication Goes a Long Way. PLoS Med, 4(2), e28. Young, N. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Al-Ubaydli, O. (2008). Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science. PLoS Med, 5(10), e201. [ Last edited by jjxytc on 2010-12-25 at 11:30 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ 070300 ѧ˶ 336·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
352Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¶«»ª´óѧ»¯Ñ§070300£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
277²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì080500Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
317Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
280·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085802
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0854µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
263Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ʯºÓ×Ó´óѧ£¨211¡¢Ë«Ò»Á÷£©Ë¶²©Ñо¿Éú³¤ÆÚÕÐÉú¹«¸æ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
SCIÂÛÎÄÒѾ·¢±íÁË£¬½á¹û·¢ÏÖÒ»ÕÅͼƬÓôíÁË£¬Ôõô°ì°¡£¿£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¡¾½»Á÷¡¿°®Òò˹̹µÄ×î´ó´íÎó
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
33221100
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 29 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2674.1
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 837
- ÔÚÏß: 357.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 915476
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-28
- רҵ: »ù´¡ÎïÀíѧ
2Â¥2011-12-10 12:13:30
ÄäÃû
Óû§×¢Ïú (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1037.9
- É¢½ð: 622
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 534
- ÔÚÏß: 141.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 0
- ×¢²á: 2011-03-17
- רҵ: µØÇòÄÚ²¿ÎïÀíѧ
3Â¥2011-12-10 13:13:58













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥