24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1343  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

daewoo

银虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请问啊 审稿人意见 是有意见还是没有意见·~~~~ 已有4人参与

这种该怎么改,没有comments  啊 。~~

Referee: 1

Recommendation: Acceptable with Minor Revision

Comments:
(There are no comments.)

Additional Questions:
1. Do the research and the results present a significant new advance to a clearly identified technological problem or biological question?: See comments

2. Are the objectives of the research clearly defined and is the research in line with the objectives?: Yes

3. Is the introduction clearly presented, and confined to the research objective?: Yes

4. Are the experimental methods appropriate, and are they described clearly and with sufficient details for the work to be repeatable?: See comments

5. Are the data quantitative, understandable, and presented clearly?: See comments

6. Is the statistical treatment of the data adequate?: See comments

7. Are the results and conclusions clearly presented and do they support the claims made by authors?: See comments

8. Is the discussion integrated with the results, clearly presented and confined to the research data?: Yes

9. Are the language, grammar and style of high standard?: See comments

10. Are the figures and tables of high quality?: See comments
    Figures was fixed and all the

11. Does the title adequately reflect the content of the manuscript?: Yes

12. Can the abstract be understood on its own and does it contain the relevant facts?: Yes

13. Is the list of references pertinent, citing all relevant references, but no unnecessary or marginally relevant references?
: Yes
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
确认没有,就问问编辑,看看审稿人是否忘了上传。这里不会有人有。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by daewoo at 2010-12-21 14:22:59:


看了。没有,我就是不知道该怎么办了。有没有遇到这种情况的、···一稿就是2 个 minor revision,有一个审稿人就是这样。但是一稿过去之后有一个接收 另一个就是这个结果。哎 ,发愁坏了。·

[ Last edi ...

8楼2010-12-21 14:49:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答
2楼2010-12-21 14:09:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

monster528

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
很多条目都优See comments

怎么没有评论呢?
3楼2010-12-21 14:10:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

daewoo

银虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by pyypyy37 at 2010-12-21 14:09:37:

可是没有commons 啊


Comments:
(There are no comments.)~~~~
4楼2010-12-21 14:15:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +14 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 34/1700 2026-08-14 09:21 by xiaruohan
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +4 启萌科技 2026-08-12 12/600 2026-08-14 09:07 by switchoff
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +10 家与远方 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-14 02:08 by 绵羊哥哥
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-13 23:20 by iwuli
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +9 Tide man 2026-08-10 10/500 2026-08-13 20:33 by 温淼淼淼
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +4 majunge000 2026-08-11 6/300 2026-08-13 16:50 by 四季常青藤
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +22 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 36/1800 2026-08-12 22:50 by sdfapple719
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 6/300 2026-08-12 16:11 by 云上清扬
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +3 yuleib84 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 21:53 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
信息提示
请填处理意见