24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

daewoo

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 120.4
散金: 100
帖子: 24
在线: 18.2小时
虫号: 186581
注册: 2006-02-16
性别: GG
专业: 微生物学

[交流] 请问啊审稿人意见是有意见还是没有意见·~~~~已有4人参与

这种该怎么改，没有comments 啊。~~

Referee: 1

Recommendation: Acceptable with Minor Revision

Comments:
(There are no comments.)

Additional Questions:
1. Do the research and the results present a significant new advance to a clearly identified technological problem or biological question?: See comments

2. Are the objectives of the research clearly defined and is the research in line with the objectives?: Yes

3. Is the introduction clearly presented, and confined to the research objective?: Yes

4. Are the experimental methods appropriate, and are they described clearly and with sufficient details for the work to be repeatable?: See comments

5. Are the data quantitative, understandable, and presented clearly?: See comments

6. Is the statistical treatment of the data adequate?: See comments

7. Are the results and conclusions clearly presented and do they support the claims made by authors?: See comments

8. Is the discussion integrated with the results, clearly presented and confined to the research data?: Yes

9. Are the language, grammar and style of high standard?: See comments

10. Are the figures and tables of high quality?: See comments
Figures was fixed and all the

11. Does the title adequately reflect the content of the manuscript?: Yes

12. Can the abstract be understood on its own and does it contain the relevant facts?: Yes

13. Is the list of references pertinent, citing all relevant references, but no unnecessary or marginally relevant references?
: Yes

回复此楼