| 查看: 6527 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有可能送审吗？
|
|||
|
投稿到Elsevier杂志， 说我英语不好，修改后再重新提交，请问我应该怎么回复他们，修改后再提交的话会不会仍然没戏，有没有重新修改后再提又拒的啊？ 还是这个技术审查未过就意味着已被拒了···？第4条和第6条说的是什么，英语不太好， 请过来人指教啊···· Dear ***, Thank you for submitting your work to *************. Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage). We regret to inform you that your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Please make changes/corrections as detailed in the comments below. When you resubmit your manuscript, please also provide a separate sheet listing your responses to the problems that were raised and upload it under the submission item 'Responses to Technical Check Results'. A sample of the "Responses" sheet can be found at: http://www.elsevierscitech.com/l ... Technical_Check.pdf We regret that without a completed "Responses" sheet, your manuscript will not be further processed. Before resubmitting your manuscript, please make sure that every aspect of the manuscript is in accordance with the Guide for Authors which is available at http://ees.elsevier.com/molcaa/ top of screen. PLEASE NOTE: Resubmission is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the journal editor. Yours sincerely, ****** Journal Manager Comments: 1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's desired standard. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully. 2) Research highlights provided should consist of a short collection of 3 to 5 bullet points that convey the core findings of the article. Each bullet point should not exceed a maximum of 85 characters including spaces. 3) Full contact details (not only email) of four international reviewers (i.e. not from the author's home country) should be provided in the cover letter and why the reviewers are appropriate should also be stated. 4) Tables should be cited sequentially in the text. 5) Reference list should be typed with double line spacing. 6) The order of the figures, tables and schemes at the end of the manuscript should be: figures, tables and schemes. Please revise. [ Last edited by tong111111 on 2010-12-19 at 20:30 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国自然评审意见
已经有7人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有12人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
-
2026年叶企孙基金
已经有6人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 说说elsevier的期刊的技术检查
已经有13人回复
- 投ELSEVIER杂志集团的BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY，能否有两个通讯作者？
已经有8人回复
- 请问大家投elsevier旗下杂志一般修回多久能有回复啊？
已经有9人回复
- 历经4次投稿之后elsevier杂志终于接受
已经有24人回复
- 投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，修改后再投还有戏吗？
已经有15人回复
- 关于elsevier投稿状态：是否已经送审？
已经有17人回复
- elsevier的技术审查是不是无论你语言怎么样，都会第一条让你改的？
已经有21人回复
- 投稿到Elsevier杂志未过技术审查，请虫友帮忙出主意。
已经有29人回复
- 3个月前投了一个Elsevier期刊被拒稿，大修后能再投吗？
已经有3人回复
- Elsevier技术审查
已经有11人回复
10楼2011-11-18 18:47:46
2楼2010-12-19 20:44:17
tong111111(金币+2): 2010-12-19 21:26:33
tong111111(金币+1): 2010-12-23 23:21:45
tong111111(金币+1): 2010-12-23 23:21:45
|
帮你顶起来 本文来自: 小木虫论坛 http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2715914&fpage=1 |
3楼2010-12-19 21:07:11
5楼2010-12-19 22:31:00
30