| 查看: 2459 | 回复: 14 | |||
biozhangliang木虫 (小有名气)
土博士
|
[交流]
BITE审稿结果回来了，给大家分享下，看接收希望大不？顺便求祝福！已有12人参与
|
|
BITE的效率还是不错的，除了审稿用了两个月。该编辑做的事情都很快！非常感谢这样的编辑，审稿人的意见有点别扭。前面说我文笔不错，后面又让我改文字，不知所云。有些意见也很不好回复。纠结，不过有得改就好。下面附上审稿意见，给大家分享下。 Reviewer #1: The manuscript describes the development of bioprocess for bioethanol production from raw sweet potato at laboratory, pilot and industrial scale. Sweet potato could become an attractive feedstock for bioethanol production provided it is produced in surplus quantities. Though China is the world's largest sweet potato producer, the cost could become the limiting factor for its use as feedstock. Instead of corn or any other starchy material, the authors have used sweet potato as the substrate after hydrolysing it with commercial amylase. The efficiencies of conversion are significantly higher even at pilot as well as industrail scale. However, the manuscript needs lot of revision before it is accepted for publication. I suggest following revisions. 1. Introduction to be shortened to one and half page. 2. All values such as ethanol concentration, productivity should be calculated as g/L and not g/kg since it is not clear that g/kg of what? Whether it is g/kg of sweet potato mash. If it is so then the calculated values are not correct. For example, in section 3.3, the author has used 24% of total carbohydrate which gives 112.4g of ethanol. This means that the ethanol yield is 93%. This also means that the experiment is started with 705 gm of total sweet potato mash and this gave 112.4 g of ethanol. This means that the maximum ethanol concentration obtained is 159g/kg of sweet potato mash. Hence I think it should be g/L and not g/kg. 3. The analysis of total carbohydrate in terms of different cellulose, hemicellulose, starch , sucrose should be given. This will help to calculate the yields and efficiencies of ethanol production. 4. Glucoamylase and amyloglucosidase activities should be mentioned. It is not clear whether 500 AGU or KNU. 5. No mention of how mant units of amylase per g of carbohydrate are used for saccharification. 6. Fig 2 is not clear with respect to symbols. Total RS for SSF, SHF and PSSF should be same which appear as different from the Figure 2. 7. In Fig 3, it is not clear how much was individual sugars such as glucose, xylose, galactose, arabinose and fructose are pre4sent during start of fermentation. It is also not clear what are A, B, C. 8. Table 3 should be removed since I see no significant difference yields, productivity, and concentration of ethanol using with and without xylanase. Xylanase appears to have no role in fermentation. If it contains xylan then it should show xylose which is not fermented by S. cerevisiae. 9. English must be revised. Reviewer #2: The manuscript was well written and according to BT's profile. The methodologies, results and discussion are clear. The manuscript shows no major news in relation to what is already published about bioethanol production from starch products (corn, cassava, sweet potato). The yields achieved in the fermentation (laboratory, pilot and industrial) are satisfactory. For this article brings some interesting information I suggest that the authors include in results and discussion a new table comparing production costs for bioethanol production from sweet potato and compare with other raw materials (corn, sugar beet, cassava, sugar cane and lignocellulosics). A review of English must also be made. Other comments - Remove first sentence from abstract - Remove Fig 3 by giving details in text only. - Include following refs in introduction/discussion: Bioresource Technology 101 (24), pp. 9710-9714; Therrmodynamic analysis of lignocellulosic biofuel production via a biochemical process: Guiding technology selection and research focus, Sohel, M.I., Jack, M.W.Bioresource Technology, Article in Press, Biomass and Bioenergy 34 (9), pp. 1336-1341; 这个Other comments是不是可以理解为编辑的意见？要是编辑让加该期刊的文章，是不是就意味着编辑比较倾向接收该杂志，这个有点不解 [ Last edited by 邂逅の浪漫 on 2010-12-16 at 09:50 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
随缘读博 一篇中科院一区Top 一篇中科院二区Top 两篇专利
已经有15人回复
-
找不到审稿人
已经有6人回复
-
职称论文
已经有13人回复
-
核心期刊那个阶段最难
已经有4人回复
-
小论文影响大论文查重吗？
已经有4人回复
-
博后面上太难了
已经有17人回复
-
大学老师
已经有14人回复
-
angew三个小修，返修过去已经20多天了没动静，有朋友遇到这种情况吗？
已经有4人回复
-
变性人申请基金咋算性别？
已经有21人回复
-
博后资助名单出来了
已经有14人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 【原创首发】写给过去的爱恋———＜没有伤没有痛，只是一份不舍一丝眷恋＞
已经有16人回复
- 套磁之后外导回信了，请问各位这种情况接收的概率有多大？
已经有13人回复
- 如何回答审稿人问题
已经有4人回复
- 这个审稿意见如何回答（HOMO能级计算方面）？
已经有29人回复
- 因为教育部考研泄题，很担心那些落榜的学生会闹事，希望大家冷静！
已经有111人回复
- 投稿时要写一个不受欢迎的审稿人，这可咋写啊？
已经有32人回复
- 审稿意见碰到难以回答的问题
已经有17人回复
- 最近审稿人都休息吗？
已经有7人回复
- 给推荐的审稿人写信，可以吗？
已经有14人回复
- 论文审稿结束，祈福！
已经有62人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- 论文审稿回来，3个审稿人，已经修改提交了。不知道结果如何？大家评评
已经有33人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
biozhangliang
木虫 (小有名气)
土博士
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1615.7
- 散金: 130
- 帖子: 256
- 在线: 68.3小时
- 虫号: 528109
- 注册: 2008-03-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
！
2楼2010-12-14 09:11:01
zyr3365754
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5011.5
- 散金: 222
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1192
- 在线: 115.4小时
- 虫号: 655081
- 注册: 2008-11-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
3楼2010-12-14 09:32:37
zlzcg
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5111
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 101
- 在线: 205.3小时
- 虫号: 1013476
- 注册: 2010-05-07
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 昆虫学
4楼2010-12-14 10:18:16
lwiaanngg
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.773
- 金币: 7402.7
- 散金: 24
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1211
- 在线: 110.3小时
- 虫号: 43541
- 注册: 2004-04-10
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
5楼2010-12-14 10:35:46
6楼2010-12-14 10:46:42
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345476
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1421
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127549
- 在线: 8879.2小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2010-12-14 10:56:06
8楼2010-12-14 11:02:23
9楼2010-12-14 12:08:25
biozhangliang
木虫 (小有名气)
土博士
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1615.7
- 散金: 130
- 帖子: 256
- 在线: 68.3小时
- 虫号: 528109
- 注册: 2008-03-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
10楼2010-12-15 09:33:08
10