²é¿´: 1123  |  »Ø¸´: 4
±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·­ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

[½»Á÷] °ïÎÒ¿´¿´·­ÒëµÄ¶Ô²»¶Ô£¬ÐÞ¸ÄÒ»ÏÂÓï·¨µÈ·½ÃæµÄÎÊÌâ

In order to characterize probable electrode reaction pathways of adsorption H on Pt(100) surface, we applied energetically the most stable configuration which was obtained from the H adsorption to map out the minimum-energy paths(MEP) using elastic band method. Here, a (4¡Á1) surface unit cell with a slab of three layers thickness(36 Pt atoms) was chosen to model adsorption of H on Pt(100) surface(the single structure determined lattice constant of 8.324Å was used for the production of Pt(100) surface). The slab was repeated periodically with a 13.962Å of vacuum region between the slabs. Plausible intermediates for the H-Pt(100) interactions was initially optimized by placing H atoms at two different active sites on the Pt(100) surface, including ¡°Pt-bridge site and Pt-hollow site¡±, corresponding to the structure of Pt(100) surface.
Obviously, the anode would lose electrons during electrode reaction. The adsorption energy and Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface after optimization are presented in Table 1. The negative adsorption energy comes from the computational procedure that the geometry optimization is carried out only in no-spin-polarization calculation. Seeing from the Table 1, the adsorption energy for bridge site is larger than the hollow site¡¯s. Namely, bridge site on the terrace is stable after geometry optimization, the hollow site on the terrace maybe the intermediate state.
Furthermore, we analyzed Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface(seen from table 1), Before electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.035 Å, 1.613 Å, respectively. The H-Pt distance at bridge site is shorter than that of hollow site. That is, the bridge site is more stable than another one. After electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.029 Å, 1.607 Å, respectively. Zhang******* used the Morse Potential to calculate Pt-H distance at the most stable state is 1.79 Å, which result is similar to ours. It is found that the distance of Pt-H becomes shorter during the electrode reaction. By comparing the bridge sites with the hollow sites, for Pt-H distance, it shows that the latter is shorter than the former and it is indicated that the adsorption energy for the latter will be larger. In conclusion, adsorption of H on Pt(100) can take place and the best adsorption site is the bridge site.

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:

²é¿´È«²¿É¢½ðÌù

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
ÄãÊý¹ýÓжàÉÙµ¥´Êô£¿
4Â¥2010-12-11 13:03:09
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 5 ¸ö»Ø´ð
The first 2 sentences are rearranged:

In order to characterize the probable electrode reaction pathways of H adsorption on Pt (100) surface, the most stable (energy) configuration was applied. By using elastic band method, the configuration was obtained from the minimum-energy paths (MEP) of the H adsorption.
2Â¥2010-12-11 12:20:27
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
zhangzhiweia(½ð±Ò+5, ·­ÒëEPI+1):лл£¬ÄúÐÁ¿àÁË 2010-12-11 18:21:55
The most energetically stable configuration was obtained from the H adsorption by using elastic band method and was utilized to characterize probable electrode reaction pathways of adsorption H on Pt(100) surface by maping out the minimum-energy paths(MEP). A (4¡Á1) surface unit cell with a slab of three layers thickness(36 Pt atoms) was selected to model adsorption of H on Pt(100) surface(the single structure determined lattice constant of 8.324Å was used for the production of Pt(100) surface). The slab was repeated periodically with a 13.962Å in vacuum region between the slabs. Plausible intermediates for the H-Pt(100) interactions was initially optimized by placing H atoms at two different active sites on the Pt(100) surface, including ¡°Pt-bridge site and Pt-hollow site¡±, corresponding to the structure of Pt(100) surface. During electrode reaction£¬the anode would lose electrons. After optimization£¬the adsorption energy and Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface are presented in Table 1. The negative adsorption energy comes from the computer procedure that the geometry optimization is carried out only in no-spin-polarization calculation. As shown in Table 1, the adsorption energy for bridge site is larger than that for the hollow site. Namely, bridge site on the terrace is more stable after geometry optimization, the hollow site on the terrace might be under the intermediate state. Furthermore, Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface(seen from table 1) was analyzed. Before electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.035 Å, 1.613 Å respectively. The H-Pt distance at bridge site is shorter than that at hollow site. That is, the bridge site is more stable than another. After electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.029 Å and1.607 Å, respectively. Zhang******* reported the morse Potential of 1.79 Å for calculating Pt-H distance at the most stable state, similar to our result. The distance of Pt-H was found to become shorter in the electrode reaction. The Pt-H distance for the bridge sites is shorter as  compared with that for the hollow sites, indicating that the adsorption energy for the latter will be larger. In conclusion, the best adsorption of H on Pt(100) occurs in the bridge site.
5Â¥2010-12-11 13:24:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 346Çóµ÷¼Á[0856] +3 WayneLim327 2026-03-16 6/300 2026-03-19 11:21 by WayneLim327
[¿¼ÑÐ] 294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶ +9 ݤÎÉ­ÁÖ 2026-03-18 9/450 2026-03-19 11:12 by kakakapanpan
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìרҵ 282·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +5 ·ãÇÅZL 2026-03-18 5/250 2026-03-19 11:08 by kakakapanpan
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á +6 Ymlll 2026-03-18 9/450 2026-03-19 10:28 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ±¾¿ÆÖ£ÖÝ´óѧÎïÀíѧԺ£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¿Æ070200ѧ˶£¬346Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ÎÒ²»ÊÇÒ»¸ù´Ð 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-19 09:11 by ¸¡ÔÆ166
[¿¼ÑÐ] 311Çóµ÷¼Á +6 26ÑÐ0 2026-03-15 6/300 2026-03-18 14:43 by haxia
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¹¤¿Æ²ÄÁÏ085601 279Çóµ÷¼Á +6 À§ÓÚÐdz¿ 2026-03-17 6/300 2026-03-18 10:21 by kkcoco25
[¿¼ÑÐ] 334Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶ÒâÔÚ»úÐ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-18 08:34 by lm4875102
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ±»ÎÒÑÔÖУºÐÂÄ£°å²»Ç¿µ÷¸ñʽÁË£¬¼Ùר¼Ò¿ªÊ¼¹Ü¸ñʽÁË +4 beefly 2026-03-14 4/200 2026-03-17 22:04 by »ÆÄñÓÚ·ÉChao
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á +3 éÙËÌ. 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-17 21:43 by ÓÐÖ»ÀêÅ«
[˶²©¼ÒÔ°] ºþ±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ ÉúÃü¿ÆÑ§Ó뽡¿µÑ§Ôº-¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶Ê³Æ·/ÉúÎï·½Ïò˶ʿ +3 1ϲ´º8 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-17 17:18 by ber´¨cool×Ó
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á +3 ä¿ya_~ 2026-03-17 5/250 2026-03-17 09:25 by Winj1e
[¿¼ÑÐ] 274Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ʱ¼äµã 2026-03-13 5/250 2026-03-17 07:34 by ÈÈÇéɳĮ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 304Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ËØÄê¼ÀÓï 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 17:00 by ÎҵĴ¬Îҵĺ£
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐʦ·¶071000£¬325Çóµ÷¼Á +6 RuitingC 2026-03-12 6/300 2026-03-16 14:50 by ¿Éµ­²»¿ÉÍü
[¿¼ÑÐ] 288Çóµ÷¼Á +4 Ææµã0314 2026-03-14 4/200 2026-03-14 23:04 by JourneyLucky
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÏÖÔÚÈçºÎ»Ø±ÜÈ¥ÄêµÄijһ¸öר¼Ò£¬²»ÖªµÀÃû×Ö +3 zk200107 2026-03-12 6/300 2026-03-14 17:13 by zk200107
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó²ÄÁÏ324·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +5 ãÆÐñ¶« 2026-03-14 5/250 2026-03-14 14:53 by ľ¹Ï¸à
[¿¼ÑÐ] 329Çóµ÷¼Á +3 miaodesi 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 20:53 by 18595523086
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ³ÌÓ꺼 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 15:06 by JourneyLucky
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û