±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 1134  |  »Ø¸´: 4
±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·­ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴

[½»Á÷] °ïÎÒ¿´¿´·­ÒëµÄ¶Ô²»¶Ô£¬ÐÞ¸ÄÒ»ÏÂÓï·¨µÈ·½ÃæµÄÎÊÌâ

In order to characterize probable electrode reaction pathways of adsorption H on Pt(100) surface, we applied energetically the most stable configuration which was obtained from the H adsorption to map out the minimum-energy paths(MEP) using elastic band method. Here, a (4¡Á1) surface unit cell with a slab of three layers thickness(36 Pt atoms) was chosen to model adsorption of H on Pt(100) surface(the single structure determined lattice constant of 8.324Å was used for the production of Pt(100) surface). The slab was repeated periodically with a 13.962Å of vacuum region between the slabs. Plausible intermediates for the H-Pt(100) interactions was initially optimized by placing H atoms at two different active sites on the Pt(100) surface, including ¡°Pt-bridge site and Pt-hollow site¡±, corresponding to the structure of Pt(100) surface.
Obviously, the anode would lose electrons during electrode reaction. The adsorption energy and Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface after optimization are presented in Table 1. The negative adsorption energy comes from the computational procedure that the geometry optimization is carried out only in no-spin-polarization calculation. Seeing from the Table 1, the adsorption energy for bridge site is larger than the hollow site¡¯s. Namely, bridge site on the terrace is stable after geometry optimization, the hollow site on the terrace maybe the intermediate state.
Furthermore, we analyzed Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface(seen from table 1), Before electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.035 Å, 1.613 Å, respectively. The H-Pt distance at bridge site is shorter than that of hollow site. That is, the bridge site is more stable than another one. After electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.029 Å, 1.607 Å, respectively. Zhang******* used the Morse Potential to calculate Pt-H distance at the most stable state is 1.79 Å, which result is similar to ours. It is found that the distance of Pt-H becomes shorter during the electrode reaction. By comparing the bridge sites with the hollow sites, for Pt-H distance, it shows that the latter is shorter than the former and it is indicated that the adsorption energy for the latter will be larger. In conclusion, adsorption of H on Pt(100) can take place and the best adsorption site is the bridge site.

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:

²é¿´È«²¿É¢½ðÌù

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
The first 2 sentences are rearranged:

In order to characterize the probable electrode reaction pathways of H adsorption on Pt (100) surface, the most stable (energy) configuration was applied. By using elastic band method, the configuration was obtained from the minimum-energy paths (MEP) of the H adsorption.
2Â¥2010-12-11 12:20:27
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
ÖÁÉÙ50¸ö½ð±Ò1
3Â¥2010-12-11 13:02:43
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
ÄãÊý¹ýÓжàÉÙµ¥´Êô£¿
4Â¥2010-12-11 13:03:09
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
zhangzhiweia(½ð±Ò+5, ·­ÒëEPI+1):лл£¬ÄúÐÁ¿àÁË 2010-12-11 18:21:55
The most energetically stable configuration was obtained from the H adsorption by using elastic band method and was utilized to characterize probable electrode reaction pathways of adsorption H on Pt(100) surface by maping out the minimum-energy paths(MEP). A (4¡Á1) surface unit cell with a slab of three layers thickness(36 Pt atoms) was selected to model adsorption of H on Pt(100) surface(the single structure determined lattice constant of 8.324Å was used for the production of Pt(100) surface). The slab was repeated periodically with a 13.962Å in vacuum region between the slabs. Plausible intermediates for the H-Pt(100) interactions was initially optimized by placing H atoms at two different active sites on the Pt(100) surface, including ¡°Pt-bridge site and Pt-hollow site¡±, corresponding to the structure of Pt(100) surface. During electrode reaction£¬the anode would lose electrons. After optimization£¬the adsorption energy and Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface are presented in Table 1. The negative adsorption energy comes from the computer procedure that the geometry optimization is carried out only in no-spin-polarization calculation. As shown in Table 1, the adsorption energy for bridge site is larger than that for the hollow site. Namely, bridge site on the terrace is more stable after geometry optimization, the hollow site on the terrace might be under the intermediate state. Furthermore, Pt-H distance for hydrogen on Pt(100) surface(seen from table 1) was analyzed. Before electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.035 Å, 1.613 Å respectively. The H-Pt distance at bridge site is shorter than that at hollow site. That is, the bridge site is more stable than another. After electrode reaction, the Pt-H distances for the hollow site and bridge site are 2.029 Å and1.607 Å, respectively. Zhang******* reported the morse Potential of 1.79 Å for calculating Pt-H distance at the most stable state, similar to our result. The distance of Pt-H was found to become shorter in the electrode reaction. The Pt-H distance for the bridge sites is shorter as  compared with that for the hollow sites, indicating that the adsorption energy for the latter will be larger. In conclusion, the best adsorption of H on Pt(100) occurs in the bridge site.
5Â¥2010-12-11 13:24:28
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ zhangzhiweia µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +9 zyxÉϰ¶£¡ 2026-04-04 9/450 2026-04-05 22:08 by ×íÎÌwl
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +10 Hllºú 2026-04-04 10/500 2026-04-05 20:09 by nepu_uu
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ¹ËÈô¸¡Éú 2026-04-05 3/150 2026-04-05 18:32 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600µ÷¼Á +9 ¶«ÕÕÕÕÕÕ 2026-04-04 9/450 2026-04-05 13:44 by ujn_zhuj
[¿¼ÑÐ] 323Çóµ÷¼Á£¨¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õºÍ´óÄ£ÐÍÏîÄ¿¾­Àú£© +3 chaoxiicy 2026-03-31 3/150 2026-04-05 10:33 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] µ÷¼Á +11 JLLLLLLLLLL 2026-04-03 11/550 2026-04-04 22:21 by hemengdong
[¿¼ÑÐ] [µ÷¼ÁÐÅÏ¢]085408¹âµçÐÅÏ¢ Çóµ÷¼Á ×Ü·Ö291·ÖÊýÒ»Ó¢Ò» +3 iz11az 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-04 19:09 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ũҵ¹¤³ÌÓëÐÅÏ¢¼ 2026-04-04 3/150 2026-04-04 12:19 by Éá¶øºóµÃ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 400·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 ÞÏÞÎÇÒÄÓÍ· 2026-04-04 3/150 2026-04-04 08:41 by jp9609
[¿¼ÑÐ] 294Çóµ÷¼Á +6 Grey_Ey 2026-04-03 6/300 2026-04-03 20:46 by ÐÀϲ777
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÊÞÒ½µ÷¼Á +3 wh119216 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-03 19:34 by zrongyan
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸´óÁ¬º£ÊÂ085600£¬349 +11 ³ÔµÄ²»ÉÙ 2026-03-30 11/550 2026-04-03 18:05 by Jimmyandyou
[¿¼ÑÐ] 320Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Õñ¡ªTZ 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-03 14:42 by fxue1114
[¿¼ÑÐ] 274Çóµ÷¼Á +10 Ѧ¶¨Ú̵Ļ¢¡£ 2026-04-01 10/500 2026-04-03 10:13 by tianyyysss
[¿¼ÑÐ] 260Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÖìÜÆÁÕ 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-03 08:44 by yulian1987
[¿¼ÑÐ] 296Çóµ÷¼Á +4 sdhu 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-02 21:29 by baoball
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á 302·Ö³õÊÔ 0854 +5 Áæ¿ÉÀÖ 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 17:53 by ±ÊÂä½õÖÝ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì268·Ö¶×µ÷¼Á +8 ÔÂÕÕ»¨ÁÖ¡£ 2026-04-01 8/400 2026-04-01 22:08 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] °²È«¹¤³Ì 285 Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Xinyu56 2026-04-01 4/200 2026-04-01 21:50 by ¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©¿Æ¼¼´óѧ085601²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÓ¢Ò»Êý¶þ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Ë«ÂíβƦÀϰå2 2026-03-31 5/250 2026-04-01 09:04 by oooqiao
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û