24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 651  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lxdytu

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 文章被拒,请高手支招!!!

> Comments to the Author
>  This manuscript, as far as I know, is original.
> Under my point of view the manuscript does not fulfils the minimum scientific requirements of urgency or impact as far as rapid publication would be advantageous to the progress of chemical research.
> Although, manuscript is presented correctly in form and content to help the understanding of the readership, it does not report very high quality new work of such importance that merits urgent publication. I recommend rejection.
>
>
> Referee: 2
> Comments to the Author
> The work is well conducted and showed, although it is addressed to a narrow range of scientists, therefore does not have the high impact and a broad audience required for publication in ChemComm. There are also some problems with References, i.e. the numbering is 1, 1d,e, 1a and besides more representative work should be added. I suggest that this paper is not suitable for ChemComm, a more specialized materials journal is recommended.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

无著心

木虫 (著名写手)

只能换期刊了
两个人都不建议接收,这个杂志应该没可能了
7楼2010-12-02 14:00:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

Renr

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

不要气馁
6楼2010-12-02 13:48:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jijiabing52

木虫 (正式写手)

换个期刊投。这个期刊可能有点高。
爱拼才会赢
9楼2010-12-02 14:50:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见