| 查看: 662 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
文章被拒,请高手支招!!!
|
|||
|
> Comments to the Author > This manuscript, as far as I know, is original. > Under my point of view the manuscript does not fulfils the minimum scientific requirements of urgency or impact as far as rapid publication would be advantageous to the progress of chemical research. > Although, manuscript is presented correctly in form and content to help the understanding of the readership, it does not report very high quality new work of such importance that merits urgent publication. I recommend rejection. > > > Referee: 2 > Comments to the Author > The work is well conducted and showed, although it is addressed to a narrow range of scientists, therefore does not have the high impact and a broad audience required for publication in ChemComm. There are also some problems with References, i.e. the numbering is 1, 1d,e, 1a and besides more representative work should be added. I suggest that this paper is not suitable for ChemComm, a more specialized materials journal is recommended. |
» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有11人回复
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
荧光猝灭法定量测定药物投哪个杂志比较好
已经有2人回复
连续两次被拒!!!
已经有26人回复
jijiabing52
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2037.4
- 散金: 265
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 538
- 在线: 103小时
- 虫号: 906378
- 注册: 2009-11-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用数学方法

9楼2010-12-02 14:50:22







回复此楼