| ²é¿´: 1636 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
jly_jly¾èÖú¹ó±ö (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÖÐÓм¸´¦Ó¢ÎIJ»ÊǺÜÈ·¶¨£¬ÇëÅ£ÈËÖ¸µã£¡
|
||
|
ÎÒµÚÒ»´ÎͶ¹úÍâµÄSCI£¬ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûÖÐÓм¸´¦²»ÊǺÜÈ·¶¨£¬¿ÒÇë´ó¼ÒÖ¸µã¡£²»Éõ¸Ð¼¤£¡ 1.Çë°ï¼ì²éÒ»ÏÂÎÒ·ÒëµÄÊÇ·ñÓÐÎó£¿ Each of these items are orthogonal. That is, can be done or not done independently. The paper should evaluate the speed benefit of each item both to your algorithm and to the original RCT (with the item as a modification). ÕâЩÏîÖеÄÿһÏî¶¼ÊÇÖ±½»µÄ£¬Ò²¾ÍÊÇ˵£¬Ã¿Ò»Ïî¶¼¿ÉÒÔ¶ÀÁ¢Ê¹Óûò²»Ê¹Ó᣸ÃÎÄÓ¦¸Ã²âÁ¿Ã¿Ò»Ïî¶ÔÄãµÄËã·¨ºÍÔRCTËã·¨ÔÚ¼ÆËãËÙ¶ÈÉÏ´øÀ´µÄÌá¸ß³Ì¶È£¨ÓÃÿһÏîÀ´½øÐÐÐ޸ģ©¡£ 2.Çë°ï¼ì²éÒ»ÏÂÎÒ·ÒëµÄÊÇ·ñÓÐÎó£¿ I thought you miss something between ". by one" and "and then check ." In here, you just increase the score by one, it is surely less than nt. ÎÒÈÏΪÄãÔÚ". by one" ºÍ "and then check ." ¼ä©µôÁËһЩ¶«Î÷¡£´Ë´¦£¬Äã¸Õ¸Õ¶Ôthe score½øÐÐÁ˼Ó1ÔËË㣬Äǵ±È»Òª±ÈntСÁË¡£ 3.Çë°ï¼ì²éÒ»ÏÂÎÒ·ÒëµÄÊÇ·ñÓÐÎó£¿ I thought Eq. (1) should be hold with Eqs.(2)-(4) as the conditions needed to affirm the candidate circle. ÎÒÈÏΪ·½³Ì(1) Ó¦¸ÃÊÊÓÃÓÚ·½³Ì(2)-(4)£¬ÒòΪÕâЩÌõ¼þÐèҪȥȷÈϺòѡԲ¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
081700£¬311£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤085600 310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤371Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
336²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ334Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
331Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϾ©º½¿Õº½Ìì´óѧ ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
zerohead
½û³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 466
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.301
- ½ð±Ò: 8727.8
- É¢½ð: 850
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 3768
- ÔÚÏß: 471.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1041741
- ×¢²á: 2010-06-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Â߼ѧ
2Â¥2010-11-08 17:31:41














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥