| 查看: 1799 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
牛奶糖木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
请大家帮忙分析编辑返回的意见 已有11人参与
|
||
|
前段时间投了一篇综述，请大家帮忙分析下，编辑返回的意见： Your manuscript entitled "***" submitted to *** was evaluated by the Editorial Board and three expert reviewers. It is the policy of our journal that review articles should be written by researchers who have their own experience in the subject, as documented by their related publcations. This is, however, not the case of your article, as stated by Reviewer #2 ("...the authors have not published anything on the ***, while their yield on the *** is quite limited"  . This Reviewer as well as Reviewer #3 also point to several weak points of your article. Nevertheless, with regard to some positive aspects of your article, as noted by Revieres #1 and #3, we are ready to re-evaluate your article, if it is completely re-written, taking into account all suggestions and criticism of our Reviewers.这算是据稿了吧，但又说we are ready to re-evaluate your article, if it is completely re-written, taking into account all suggestions and criticism of our Reviewers. 同时他又说：It is the policy of our journal that review articles should be written by researchers who have their own experience in the subject, as documented by their related publcations.（声明一下，本人的这篇综述主要是总结了该领域的最新进展，罗列的文献很少有我们实验室发表的，本人为一作发表的更少），那重新修改后再投还有希望吗，会不会浪费时间？再投算是新稿件还是？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
001USA
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 25.5
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 265
- 在线: 31.1小时
- 虫号: 496352
- 注册: 2008-01-18
- 专业: IT & microelectronics
4楼2010-10-28 23:45:29
sean032
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5494.7
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 370
- 在线: 246小时
- 虫号: 1015190
- 注册: 2010-05-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属与非金属地下开采
3楼2010-10-28 23:22:47
5楼2010-10-29 00:04:02
shuimo40
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 836.6
- 散金: 5
- 帖子: 619
- 在线: 86.2小时
- 虫号: 549226
- 注册: 2008-04-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 自然地理学
6楼2010-10-29 01:12:01