| ²é¿´: 1951 | »Ø¸´: 11 | |||
Å£ÄÌÌÇľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎö±à¼·µ»ØµÄÒâ¼û ÒÑÓÐ11È˲ÎÓë
|
|
ǰ¶Îʱ¼äͶÁËһƪ×ÛÊö£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöÏ£¬±à¼·µ»ØµÄÒâ¼û£º Your manuscript entitled "***" submitted to *** was evaluated by the Editorial Board and three expert reviewers. It is the policy of our journal that review articles should be written by researchers who have their own experience in the subject, as documented by their related publcations. This is, however, not the case of your article, as stated by Reviewer #2 ("...the authors have not published anything on the ***, while their yield on the *** is quite limited" . This Reviewer as well as Reviewer #3 also point to several weak points of your article. Nevertheless, with regard to some positive aspects of your article, as noted by Revieres #1 and #3, we are ready to re-evaluate your article, if it is completely re-written, taking into account all suggestions and criticism of our Reviewers.ÕâËãÊǾݸåÁ˰ɣ¬µ«ÓÖ˵we are ready to re-evaluate your article, if it is completely re-written, taking into account all suggestions and criticism of our Reviewers. ͬʱËûÓÖ˵£ºIt is the policy of our journal that review articles should be written by researchers who have their own experience in the subject, as documented by their related publcations.£¨ÉùÃ÷һϣ¬±¾È˵ÄÕâÆª×ÛÊöÖ÷ÒªÊÇ×ܽáÁ˸ÃÁìÓòµÄ×îнøÕ¹£¬ÂÞÁеÄÎÄÏ׺ÜÉÙÓÐÎÒÃÇʵÑéÊÒ·¢±íµÄ£¬±¾ÈËΪһ×÷·¢±íµÄ¸üÉÙ£©£¬ÄÇÖØÐÂÐ޸ĺóÔÙͶ»¹ÓÐÏ£ÍûÂ𣬻᲻»áÀË·Ñʱ¼ä£¿ÔÙͶËãÊÇиå¼þ»¹ÊÇ£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
277Çóµ÷¼Á ÊýÒ»104·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
277¹¤¿ÆÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¹¤¿Æ 22408 267ÇóÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
270·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
smile_1892
ͳæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3853.2
- É¢½ð: 2090
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 1167
- ÔÚÏß: 112.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1124026
- ×¢²á: 2010-10-16
- רҵ: ¿Õ¼ä»·¾³ºÍ¿Õ¼äÌìÆø
2Â¥2010-10-28 23:05:40
sean032
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5494.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 370
- ÔÚÏß: 246Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1015190
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊôÓë·Ç½ðÊôµØÏ¿ª²É
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ¸Ð¾õ»¹ºÃ°É£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊÇ´óÐÞ£¬°´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û¸ÄÁËÔÙ˵ |

3Â¥2010-10-28 23:22:47
001USA
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 25.5
- É¢½ð: 50
- Ìû×Ó: 265
- ÔÚÏß: 31.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 496352
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-18
- רҵ: IT & microelectronics

4Â¥2010-10-28 23:45:29
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ΪɶÉÏÀ´¾Íд×ÛÊö£¬ºÜ²»½â£¬×î½üÔÚСľ³æÉÏ¿´µ½´ËÀàÌù×ÓÒ²²»ÉÙ£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÒÀÈ»±íʾ²»½â£¬Ò²ºÜ²»ÈÏͬÄãµÄ×ö·¨£¬²»½öÄ㣬Á¬ÄãʵÑéÊÒ¶¼Ã»×ö³öɶ¶«Î÷µÄ·½Ïò£¬ÄãдµÄ×ÛÊöÄÜÒý·¢±ðÈ˵ÄÈκÎ˼¿¼Â𣿠»¹ÊDz»ÒªÐ´ÁË£¬»òÕß×Ô¼ºµ±¸öÁ·ÊֵĻú»áËãÁË£¬ÀÏʵ×öµãÓÐÓõĿÆÑÐ |
5Â¥2010-10-29 00:04:02
shuimo40
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 838.6
- É¢½ð: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 620
- ÔÚÏß: 86.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 549226
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ×ÔÈ»µØÀíѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ¸öÈ˸оõ£¬×ÛÊö¶¼ÊÇ´óÅ£ÃÇд³öÀ´µÄ£¬·ÇÎҵȷº·ºÖ®±²ËùÄÜ |
6Â¥2010-10-29 01:12:01
thch19
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
×·Çó³É¹¦
- Ó¦Öú: 31 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9784.5
- É¢½ð: 245
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 5488
- ÔÚÏß: 457Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 304206
- ×¢²á: 2006-12-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: È˹¤ÖÇÄÜÓë֪ʶ¹¤³Ì
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ½¨Òé½øÐÐÐ޸쬻¹ÊÇÓÐÏ£ÍûµÄ£¬×£ºÃÔË£¡£¡£¡£¡ |
7Â¥2010-10-29 06:55:43
haoshunli
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 6760.4
- É¢½ð: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1783
- ÔÚÏß: 435.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 688458
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-06
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| Ó¦¸Ã»¹ÓÐÏ£Íû°É£¬²»ÊÇ˵Á˰´×ÅÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûºÃºÃÐ޸ģ¬ÔÙÊÔÊÔ£¬Ò²Ã»ÓÐÖ±½Ó¾Ý£¬Óлú»á |
8Â¥2010-10-29 08:39:27
Å£ÄÌÌÇ
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3891.3
- É¢½ð: 31
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1093
- ÔÚÏß: 265.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 737785
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-01
- רҵ: ΢ÉúÎïÉúÀíÓëÉúÎﻯѧ
9Â¥2010-10-29 10:28:54
libeny
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 132 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9613.4
- É¢½ð: 256
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 11122
- ÔÚÏß: 429.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1094325
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-09
- רҵ: µÚËļ͵ØÖÊѧ

10Â¥2010-10-29 10:45:24














. This Reviewer as well as Reviewer #3 also point to several weak points of your article. Nevertheless, with regard to some positive aspects of your article, as noted by Revieres #1 and #3, we are ready to re-evaluate your article, if it is completely re-written, taking into account all suggestions and criticism of our Reviewers.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥