| 查看: 458 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
lzjketty金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
翻译一段文字（中译英）
|
||
| 在洪水后期（洪水过后的阶段），即便是到了下游，两种模型的模拟结果也存在一定的差异，A模型的水位要高于B模型。但洪水后期的水位已经不那么重要。同样，从图5中可以看出，流量过程的模拟结果也是这样，整体而言，两种模型之间并不存在实质性的差异，B模型也能够较好的模拟洪水过程。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有10人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
yunyanwuhen
木虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 21
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4952.8
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 403
- 在线: 139.9小时
- 虫号: 505648
- 注册: 2008-02-17
- 专业: 有机合成
lzjketty(金币+10, 翻译EPI+1):谢谢 2010-10-22 07:51:05
| In the later flood period (the period after the flood), even if it was in the lower reaches, the simulation results of the two models was different to a certain extent, that is, the water level of model A was higher than model B. But the water level after the flood was not so important any more. Fig 5 showed that it did not exist a material difference between the simulation results of the two models' flux process and the flood process was well simulated by model B. |
2楼2010-10-21 23:13:18