24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3138  |  回复: 14

江枫2008

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 申述信... 已有5人参与

最近投scripta mater. 被reject了。看了一下审稿人的意见,感觉这个审稿人不是我所研究领域的,遂起写了一篇申述信,不知道有没有用,但是感觉还是应该尝试一下,大家看看我怎么写可以吗?给点意见
Dear Prof.**,
Our manuscript titled ** was submitted to Scripta Materialia and was rejected after sending out for review. We would like to thank the editor and the reviewer for giving us constructive suggestions which would help us in depth to improve the quality of the paper. However, we think there are no sufficient reasons in the decision letter for us to accept the conclusion and the reviewer seems to misunderstand the purpose of our study. Our paper is studying **. This is a significant aspect in the field of**. Some characteristics of Ti alloys under impact loading are completely different from those under conventional processing conditions, such as super plasticity, ultrafine grains and amorphization. The phase transformation of Ti alloys is really complex, and as regard to omega phase transformation, there are two types: althermal omega phase and isothermal omega phase. This paper is precisely observed the althermal omega phase transformation in Ti alloys during **. There are two innovations here: one is**for the first time and the other one is **. We believe that our investigation is a good work with scientific meaning on materials dynamic behavior and fit for the purpose of Scripta Materialia, although the evidences may be insufficient in our manuscript. The followings are our opinions toward to the reviewer comments. We really appreciate you if you can read it and have reconsideration towards our manuscript.
Sincerely yours,
**

[ Last edited by 江枫2008 on 2010-9-26 at 10:29 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

论文发表需用的各种模板 SCI论文攻略 xjjin

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dale79

金虫 (著名写手)

没用!!!
2楼2010-09-26 10:03:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

江枫2008

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by dale79 at 2010-09-26 10:03:32:
没用!!!

申述没有呗?
3楼2010-09-26 10:04:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (小有名气)

本帖仅楼主可见
4楼2010-09-26 10:06:34
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

mingjing16

金虫 (正式写手)

有枣没枣打三竿子
用心才能把事做好
5楼2010-09-26 10:12:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yw__577

金虫 (文坛精英)

基本没用
另外此贴非资源帖
6楼2010-09-26 10:26:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

江枫2008

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by yw__577 at 2010-09-26 10:26:08:
基本没用
另外此贴非资源帖

发错地方了。。。。
7楼2010-09-26 10:29:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libeny

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

0.25

基本上没有用,不过你既然写了就上吧
加油!
8楼2010-09-26 10:41:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

为什么不直接修改,重投回去?cover letter里可以解释和说明。那样不耽误时间。

编辑处理,需要时间。编辑不回(或送审稿人在看,审稿人不回),那你怎么办?
9楼2010-09-26 10:41:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

江枫2008

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2010-09-26 10:41:59:
为什么不直接修改,重投回去?cover letter里可以解释和说明。那样不耽误时间。

编辑处理,需要时间。编辑不回(或送审稿人在看,审稿人不回),那你怎么办?

因为评审意见没什么实质性的东西,所以就想申述一下
10楼2010-09-26 11:02:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 江枫2008 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见