| 查看: 2610 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
hk0320051新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
帮忙看一下Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology的回复 已有6人参与
|
||
|
我四月中旬在 Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology上投了一篇QSAR（quantitative structure-activity relationship）类的文章，今天给了我回复： Your manuscript is judged to be a Negotiable Rejection. This means that the reviewers and the editors believe your manuscript can be revised to make it acceptable scientifically as opposed to rejecting it outright. You must incorporate the reviewer suggestions and you must provide a list of the revisions made and a list of rebuttal comments, if any. This classification requires very careful thought about your revisions. Each suggested revision must be incorporated or rebutted. Failure to revise appropriately will result in rejection. 是拒绝了吗？ 是否还有回旋的余地？ 下面是意见（不是很明白写的是什么意思）： COMMENTS TO AUTHOR: This is a nice approach, but of what use is it? GLC retention time prediction has been around for 50 years. If the experimenter knows they are analyzing only PAHs then this works, but if they are faced witha variety of compounds then of what use is this model?? There is an additional problem with the variety of columns on the market for GLC. Which of these columns is different enough from the column used that this model would not work? The authors need to rethink the reasons for doing this study and its usefulness in the big world of science. If they think they can justify the study based on these questions then it will be reviewed again. Revise and rereview. EDITORIAL REQUIREMENTS Yes No N/A () () () Manuscript Length is Appropriate () () () Manuscript Prepared According to Instructions () () () Clearly written with proper English grammar and syntax. () () () Introductory paragraphs are concise and appropriate () () () References cited to current studies in introduction. () () () There is a clear purpose & hypothesis for the study. () () () Sampling is described. () () () Methods & Materials section is detailed so that the study could be repeated. () () () Analytical methods are described or provided by readily available reference(s). () () () Limits of detection are reported. () () () Fortified sample recoveries are reported. () () () Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section. () () () Data are compared to other studies. () () () References are current and appropriate () () () Significance of findings are described. TECHNICAL MERIT Check one rank in each category 1 = poor, 5 = excellent 1 2 3 4 5 () () () () () Clarity () () () () () Technical Quality () () () () () Originality () () () () () Novelty. () () () () () Data interpretation is appropriate. () () () () () Scientific value SIGNIFICANCE () None () Local () National () Regional () Global --- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有9人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有12人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有11人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有10人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有9人回复
-
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了
已经有7人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有9人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有10人回复
12楼2017-06-28 20:36:51
zhaors1976
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5830.5
- 散金: 181
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 588
- 在线: 957.9小时
- 虫号: 556512
- 注册: 2008-05-11
- 专业: 环境分析化学
2楼2010-09-25 16:53:00
★
hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
hk0320051(金币+1):谢谢参与
  |
4楼2010-09-26 06:12:24
7楼2014-06-23 15:15:18