24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hk0320051

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 108.2
散金: 23
帖子: 28
在线: 11.5小时
虫号: 1040651
注册: 2010-06-12
性别: GG
专业: QSAR

[交流] 帮忙看一下Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology的回复已有6人参与

我四月中旬在 Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology上投了一篇QSAR（quantitative structure-activity relationship）类的文章，今天给了我回复：

Your manuscript is judged to be a Negotiable Rejection. This means that the reviewers and the editors believe your manuscript can be revised to make it acceptable scientifically as opposed to rejecting it outright. You must incorporate the reviewer suggestions and you must provide a list of the revisions made and a list of rebuttal comments, if any.

This classification requires very careful thought about your revisions. Each suggested revision must be incorporated or rebutted. Failure to revise appropriately will result in rejection.
是拒绝了吗？
是否还有回旋的余地？
下面是意见（不是很明白写的是什么意思）：

COMMENTS TO AUTHOR:

This is a nice approach, but of what use is it?  GLC retention time prediction has been around for 50 years.  If the experimenter knows they are analyzing only PAHs then this works, but if they are faced witha variety of compounds then of what use is this model??

There is an additional problem with the variety of columns on the market for GLC.  Which of these columns is different enough from the column used that this model would not work?

The authors need to rethink the reasons for doing this study and its usefulness in the big world of science.  If they think they can justify the study based on these questions then it will be reviewed again.

Revise and rereview.

EDITORIAL REQUIREMENTS

Yes  No  N/A

()    ()    ()  Manuscript Length is Appropriate
()    ()    ()  Manuscript Prepared According to Instructions
()    ()    () Clearly written with proper English grammar and syntax.
()    ()    () Introductory paragraphs are concise and  appropriate
()    ()    ()  References cited to current studies in introduction.
()    ()    () There is a clear purpose & hypothesis for the study.
()    ()    () Sampling is described.
()    ()    () Methods & Materials section is detailed so that the study could be repeated.
()    ()    () Analytical methods are described or provided by readily available reference(s).
()    ()    () Limits of detection are reported.
()    ()    () Fortified sample recoveries are reported.
()    ()    () Statistics are appropriate and are referenced in the Materials & Methods section.
()    ()    () Data are compared to other studies.
()    ()    () References are current and appropriate
()    ()    ()  Significance of findings are described.

TECHNICAL MERIT

Check one rank in each category
   1 = poor, 5 = excellent

1  2  3  4  5
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Clarity
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Technical Quality
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Originality
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Novelty.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Data interpretation is appropriate.
()  ()  ()  ()  ()  Scientific value

SIGNIFICANCE
()  None
()  Local
()  National
()  Regional
()  Global
---

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有10人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有11人回复
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言已经有3人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有3人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有8人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是评职称时认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？已经有4人回复

1楼 2010-09-15 20:24:28

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

疏影暗光水

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 105
帖子: 11
在线: 2.2小时
虫号: 2173795
注册: 2012-12-08
专业: 环境污染化学

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

9楼: Originally posted by 蓝木棋子 at 2015-01-13 20:06:49
请问这个返修上传的的“Complete Manuscript (text, tables, and figures)”在文中有标记哪些是修改的了么？还是把修改好的文章直接上传，不用把修改的标记出来啊？...

这个期刊在哪儿提交这种修改稿？