| ²é¿´: 3640 | »Ø¸´: 11 | |||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||||
cnlicsľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾Ô´´¡¿´ÓÍ·½¨Ä£ºÍ´ÓÍ·¼ÆËã ÒÑÓÐ6È˲ÎÓë
|
||||
|
¡°´ÓÍ·¡±Õâ¸öÃû´Ê£¬Ñ§»¯Ñ§µÄÈ˸üÊìϤ£¬Á¿×Ó»¯Ñ§¡¢Á¿×ÓÁ¦Ñ§ÖУ¬ÀûÓÃѦ¶¨ÚÌ·½³Ì½âÎö²¨º¯Êý£¬½ø¶ø¼ÆËãÔ×Ó¡¢·Ö×ÓµÄÄÜÁ¿×´Ì¬·Ö²¼£¬ÊÇÊ®·Ö³£¼ûÐÐΪ£¬Õâ¶ÔÓÚÑо¿µ°°×ÖʽṹµÄÈËÀ´Ëµ£¬ÊµÔÚÊÇÌ«ÓÐÓÕ»óÁ¦ÁË£¬ÒòΪºÜÏÔÈ»µØ£¬Èç¹ûÄܼÆËã³öµ°°×Öʽṹ£¬´ÓʵÓÃÐÔÕâÒ»µãÀ´Ëµ£¬Ë¼ÆËãµÃ¶à£¬Òâζ×Å˾ÍÄÜ·¢ÏÖ¡¢ÓµÓиü¶àµÄÒ©°Ð¡£µ«ÊÜÏÞÓÚĿǰµÄ¼ÆËãÄÜÁ¦£¬¶Ôµ°°×ÖÊ»òÕ߽ϴóµÄëĶνøÐв¨º¯Êý¼ÆËãÐèÒªµÄʱ¼ä·Ç³£³¤£¬ÔÚʵ¼Ê¹¤×÷ÖÐÒª×ö´óÁ¿¼ò»¯£¬ÒýÈë·Ö×Ó¶¯Á¦Ñ§·½·¨£¬Ê¹µÃ¼ÆËãµ°°×Öʽṹ³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ£¬Ëæ×żÆËã»ú¼ÆËãµÄ½ø²½£¬µ°°×Öʽṹ¼ÆËã·½·¨Ò²»áÒ»Ö±½ø»¯×Å¡£ ¡°´ÓÍ·¡±Õâ¸ö´Ê¶ÔÓ¦µÄÀ¶¡Óï·ÒëΪab initio£¬µ±È»£¬Ò²¿ÉÒÔÊǸüΪ´ÖÂÔµÄÀí½â£¬±ÈÈçÀí½âΪde novo¡£¶ÔÓÚ¾«Ï¸µÄ»¯Ñ§¼ÆËã·½·¨£¬Ñ§ÉúÎïµÄÒ»°ã»á¸Ð¾õÍ·Ì۵ģ¬Ã×ÊÏ·½³ÌÒѾÊÇÉú»¯ÖÐÏ൱¸´ÔӵĹ«Ê½ÁË£¬¶à±äÁ¿·½³ÌÖУ¬ÏµÊýµÄÄâºÏ¡¢²ÎÊýÇó½â»áÄѵ½Ò»´óÅúѧÉúÎïµÄ¡£ÎÒ°ÑÒÔǰÕûÀíµÄ¶«Î÷·¢³öÀ´£¬¿ÉÄÜ»á¼ÓÉÏһЩ˵Ã÷£¬Ï£Íû´¿´âѧÉúÎïµÄÈËÄÜÀí½â£¬¸üÏ£ÍûÄÜÀûÓÃÏֳɵÄһЩ¹¤¾ßʵÏÖ×Ô¼ºµÄÄ¿µÄ£¬Ò²ÒòΪ´Ë£¬Ìû×ӾͲ»·ÅÔÚ¡°·Ö×ÓÄ£Ä⡱Ŀ¼ÏÂÁË£¬Ï£ÍûÄÜÆðµ½Å×שÒýÓñµÄ×÷ÓᣠÄÚÈÝÌáÒª£º µÚÒ»²¿·Ö µ°°×ÖʽṹÓë·Ö×Ó½¨Ä£ µÚ¶þ²¿·Ö µ°°×Öʽṹ½¨Ä£»ù´¡ µÚÈý²¿·Ö ´ÓÍ·Ô¤²â·½·¨ µÚËIJ¿·Ö Rosetta·½·¨ µÚÎ岿·Ö ´ÓÍ·¼ÆËã [ Last edited by cnlics on 2010-9-16 at 15:23 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
·Ö×ÓÉúÎïʵÑé¼°µ°°×´¿»¯½á¾§Ïà¹ØÁ´½Ó | µ°°×ÖÊÉúÎïѧʵÑé¾Ñé |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
347Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
280Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ҩѧ305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
085501»úеר˶ 302·Ö ²»ÌôרҵÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085404 293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
262Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
µÚÒ»ÐÔÔÀí¡¢·Ö×ÓÄ£ÄâºÍÁ¿×Ó»¯Ñ§¼ÆËãÖ®¼äµÄÇø±ðÊÇʲô
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿¡¶Á¿×Ó»¯Ñ§¡ª¡ª»ù±¾ÔÀíºÍ´ÓÍ·¼ÆËã·¨¡·¹ØÓÚGTO»ý·ÖµÄÒ»´¦Ð¡´íÎó
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿DFT·½·¨Êô²»ÊôÓÚ´ÓÍ·Ë㣿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¡¾·ÖÏí¡¿Á¿×Ó»¯Ñ§¡ª¡ª»ù±¾ÔÀíºÍ´ÓÍ·¼ÆËã·¨£¨ÉÏ¡¢ÖС¢Ï²ᣩ.pdf
ÒѾÓÐ246È˻ظ´
cnlics
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3014.2
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 270
- ÔÚÏß: 422.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 795158
- ×¢²á: 2009-06-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µ±´ú×Ú½Ì
|
Part IV: Rosetta 4.1 What¡¯s CASP£ºCritical Assessment of Structure Prediction (homology modeling, threading, and ab-initio) Every two years in Dec, community-wide blind test of prediction methods Experimentalists announce some protein sequences that they are going to resolve structurally CASP put these sequence on web for pediction with deadline Computational biologists submit their predictions CASP evaluates the predictions according to the results resolved by experimentalists http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/caspi/ ( i = 1,2,3,4,5. ) http://www.forcasp.org/ 4.2 Rosetta at CASP:an example taken from CASP5 4.3 Rosetta : the method Model: Narrow the search with local structure Prediction Scoring function(Solvation-based & Pair interactions) Method outline (two steps) Get tiny pieces:sequence profile alignment Put them together:Monte-Carlo method; Bayesian scoring function Chivian D. et al.PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 53:524¨C533 (2003) 4.3.1 Get tiny pieces:Construction of I-sites library AssumptionDistribution of conformations sampled for a given nine residue segment of the chain is reasonably well approximated by the distribution of structures adopted the sequence(and closely related sequences) in known protein structures. MethodFragment libraries for each three and nine residue segment of the chain are extracted from PDB using sequence profile alignment 4.3.2 Get tiny pieces: construction procedure Construct profiles (PSI-BLAST like) for each solved structure Collect each possible segments of fixed length (len = 3, 9, 15) Perform k-means clustering of segments Check each cluster for a ¡°coherent¡± structure (in terms of dihedral angles Prune incoherent structures Iteratively refine remaining clusters by removing structurally different segments, redefining cluster membership, etc. 4.4.1 Put them together: Procedure For representative proteins, backbones were assembled from a library of 1000 different 5-residue fragments. 4.4.2 Put them together: Monte Carlo Search the resulting conformational space with Monte-Carlo method Bayesian scoring function:Chose the most likely structure given the sequence: 4.4.3 Put them together: Scoring Function 4.5 Using Rosetta: Comparative modeling Detection of the best parent for each putative domain: Blast or PSI-Blast parents or Pcons parents Sequence alignment to that parent: K*SYNC (kitchen sink) Modeling of structurally variable regions:match with DSSP assigned secondary structure Optimization to increase the physical reasonableness of the final model:fragment replacement and random angle perturbations Reassemble the complete chain when domains were parsed and processed individually:evaluated by a coarse energy function 4.6 Using Rosetta: De Novo structure predictions Fragment libraries for each three and nine residue segment Monte Carlo procedure with energy function favoring compact structures, buried hydrophobic residues, and paired beta strands low free energy models : MC Minimization procedure to relieve backbone atomic clashes MC minimize an all-atom energy function Bonneau R. et al.J. Mol. Biol. (2002) 322, 65¨C78 4.7 Using Rosetta: Automated Method for Full Chain Structure Prediction Robetta: de novo, comparative, or mixed models Secondary structure prediction from the JUFO-3D method |
5Â¥2010-09-14 01:20:03
cnlics
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3014.2
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 270
- ÔÚÏß: 422.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 795158
- ×¢²á: 2009-06-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µ±´ú×Ú½Ì
2Â¥2010-09-14 00:41:44
cnlics
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3014.2
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 270
- ÔÚÏß: 422.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 795158
- ×¢²á: 2009-06-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µ±´ú×Ú½Ì
|
µÚ¶þ²¿·Ö µ°°×Öʽṹ½¨Ä£»ù´¡ 2.1½¨Ä£Ò»°ã¹ý³Ì¼ûÏÂͼ ![]() 2.2½á¹¹½¨Ä£·½·¨£º •´ÓÍ·½¨Ä£ •±È½Ï»òͬԴ½¨Ä£ •ÕÛµþʶ±ð»òÕß´©ÕëÒýÏߣ¨threading£©·½·¨ 2.3Á¦³¡¾ö¶¨·Ö×ÓÕÛµþ»úÀí Á¦³¡ÊÇÒ»ÖÖÃèÊö·Ö×Ó¹¹Ïó»òÕß˵Ô×Ó×ø±ê¾ö¶¨·Ö×ÓÄÜÁ¿µÄÊýѧº¯Êý¡£Á¦³¡ÊÇ·Ö×ÓÄÚ²¿»¯Ñ§¼üµÄÀÉ죬ÍäÇú£¬Å¤ÇúÒÔ¼°·¶µÂ»ªÁ¦¡¢¾²µçÏ໥×÷ÓõÈ×÷ÓõÄ×ܺ͡£ ³£ÓÃÁ¦³¡ÓУº CHARMM (Harvard) http://yuri.harvard.edu/ GROMOS96 (Groningen/ETHZ) http://www.igc.ethz.ch/gromos AMBER (Scripps) http://amber.scripps.edu SYBYL Tripos Inc. DISCOVER MSI Inc. ¡¡.. 2.4·Ç¼üÏ໥×÷Ó㨼´£¬²»ÊÇͨ¹ý»¯Ñ§¼ü¶ø²úÉúµÄ×÷Óã© •¾²µçÏ໥×÷Ó᣼ÆËã·½·¨ÊÇ£º ![]() •Çâ¼ü×÷Ó᣼ÆËã·½·¨£º ![]() •ÊèË®×÷Ó᣼ÆËã·½·¨ÎªHINT •·¶µÂ»ªÁ¦£ºÀûÓÃLennard-Jonesº¯Êý¼ÆËã ![]() 2.5¼ò»¯µÄ½á¹¹Ä£ÐÍ·½·¨ •¸ñµãÄ£ÐÍ •Àëɢ״̬·Ç¸ñµã£¨off-lattice£©Ä£ÐÍ •ͨ¹ý¾Ö²¿½á¹¹Ô¤²â£¬¼õÉÙ¹¹ÏóËÑË÷¿Õ¼ä Bonneau R. et al.Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:173¨C89 (2001 ) 2.5.1¸ñµãÄ£ÐÍ£º¼ò»¯·½·¨Îª£¬Óøñµã±íʾëÄÁ´ Óŵã:·ÖÎö¡¢¼ÆËã¼òµ¥ ȱµã: ÄÑÒÔ±íʾ¾«Ï¸µÄ¼¸ºÎÈ¡Ïò£¨ÀýÈçÁ´Å¤Çú£©£»¹Ç¼Ü½á¹¹¾«È·ÐÔ²»»á³¬¹ý¸ñµã¼ä¾àµÄÒ»°ë¡£ ![]() 2.5.2Àëɢ״̬¸ñµãÄ£ÐÍ ½µµÍ¸´ÔӶȵķ½·¨£º½öÔÊÐíÌØ¶¨µÄÖ§Á´¹¹ÏóÇÒëÄÁ´µÄ»¯Ñ§¼üת¶¯ÊÜÏÞ£¨¼´½«Ö§Á´ÏÞ¶¨Îªµ¥Ò»µÄ¹¹Ïó£»ëÄÁ´¹Ç¼ÜÏÞ¶¨ÎªÌØÊâµÄ¦Õ/¦×½Ç¶È×éºÏµÈ£© ȱµã: ¦Ø½Ç×ÜÊÇÆ½Ãæ½Ç£¨0»òÕß180¡ã£© 2.5.3ͨ¹ý¾Ö²¿¹¹ÏóÔ¤²â£¬ÏÞ¶¨×ÜÌå¹¹ÏóËÑË÷¿Õ¼ä ½µµÍ¸´ÔӶȵķ½·¨£ºÀûÓþֲ¿¹¹ÏóµÄÆ«ÏòÐÔ£¨biases£©»òÕßÐòÁлùÔª£¨motif£©½µµÍ¸´ÔÓ¶È È±µã£º¾Ö²¿¹¹ÏóµÄÆ«ÏòÐÔ£¨biases£©³Ì¶È¡¢Ç¿¶È·Ç³£ÒÀÀµÐòÁУ»²»Í¬µÄÐòÁÐÖУ¬ÐòÁлùÔª·Ç³£ÇãÏòÓÚ²ÉÈ¡µ¥Ò»µÄ¾Ö²¿¹¹Ïó 2.5´ò·Öº¯Êý »ùÓÚÈܼÁ»¯µÄ´ò·Ö·½·¨£º×ܽáÒÑÖªµ°°×ÖÊÖи÷λµãµÄÈܼÁ»¯³Ì¶È£»ÅªÇå¸÷°±»ùËáÔÚ¸÷λµã³öÏֵįµÂÊ¡£ Åä¶ÔÏ໥×÷ÓãºÄ³Á©²Ð»ùÓжà´ó¿ÉÄÜ»¥Ïà¿¿½ü ¶þ¼¶½á¹¹°²ÅÅ£º´ò·ÖÆÀ¹À¶þ¼¶½á¹¹µÄÔª¼þÖ®¼äÆ¥ÅäµÄ³Ì¶È¡£ [ Last edited by cnlics on 2010-9-18 at 19:42 ] |
3Â¥2010-09-14 00:55:43
cnlics
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3014.2
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 270
- ÔÚÏß: 422.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 795158
- ×¢²á: 2009-06-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µ±´ú×Ú½Ì
|
Part III: ab initio prediction methods 3.1 Scoring functions Molecular Dynamics simulations(MD) Monte Carlo (MC) simulations Pathway Models Combined Hierarchical Approach Genetic Algorithms more¡¡. 3.2 Ab initio prediction:Using pathway models Pathway models combine the scoring function and the search. HMMSTR-CM: a fragment library (knowledgebased potentials ) + a set of nucleation/propagation-based rules(for building a protein contact maps) 3.3 Ab initio prediction: TOUCHSTONE ----- threading based tertiary restraints SICHO (SIde CHain Only) model Prediction of tertiary restraints:side chain contact(PROSPECTOR); consensus contacts Structure selection with an atomic potential:Monte Carlo simulations; Kihara D. et al .PNAS , 98 (18) :10125¨C10130(2001) 3.4 Ab initio prediction: Combined Hierarchical Approach highly simplified tetrahedral lattice model:all-atom models combined allatom knowledge-based scoring function:three smaller subsets consensus-based distance geometry procedure Samudrala R. et al.PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Suppl 3:194¨C198 (1999) 3.5 Ab initio prediction: more¡. Distance geometry-based Ramachandran Plots-based Rosetta Huang ES et al. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 290, 267-281. Bernasconi A. et al.ERCIM News No.43 (2000 ) |
4Â¥2010-09-14 00:59:20













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥







10