| 查看: 3366 | 回复: 34 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
striveme铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
谁见过这样的审稿意见？ 已有26人参与
|
||
|
最近的一篇投稿，得到的审稿意见如下，编辑让major reversion，各位大神给点建议.怎么个搞法？ Dear Prof. XXX: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in The XXX. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have concluded that the work is of potential interest to the readership of The XXX; however, it appears that a major revision, possibly followed by further reviewer evaluation, will be needed prior to its further consideration for publication. Please see the enclosed reviewers' reports for details regarding the requested changes and/or additions. ------------------------------------ Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because it does not provide new physical insights. Comments: The authors studied XXX. The group has used this method to study polymer chains in solutions. Now they switched to small surfactant molecules. Such a system has been well studied in colloidal research. The method is a commercial instrument. I do not see that a combination of this system and this method has led us anything new. Yes, they did lots of measurement and summarize their results into some figures. That’s it! This is a simple laboratory report, not a scientific paper. Where are sciences? My guess is that these two authors just try to publish one more paper. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: This paper represents a significant new contribution and should be published as is. Comments: This is a timely report that contains high-quality experimental data and appropriate interpretation. There are very few papers dealing with the kinetics transitions and this is an excellent contribution to the field of self-assembly. I recommend publication in XXX without any changes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- [求助]如何处理这样的审稿意见：The study is descriptive in nature
已经有12人回复
- PRB这样的审稿意见算是大修还是小修？
已经有6人回复
- 这样的审稿意见，有什么回答技巧？
已经有3人回复
- 毫无审稿意见的退稿通知，啥意思？
已经有76人回复
- 这样的审稿意见退休后直接接受的可能性大不？
已经有11人回复
- 这样的审稿意见，大家见过没，求助下
已经有12人回复
- 求助 这样的审稿意见该怎么回复
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮忙看这样的审稿意见还有必要改吗，还是改投别的期刊呀！
已经有23人回复
- 求助 这样的审稿意见该怎么回复
已经有5人回复
- Talanta文章被拒，但请各位帮我看看这样的审稿意见是什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 这样的审稿意见怎么办
已经有8人回复
- 这样的审稿意见，让我何去何从呢，请虫友们帮忙，急呀
已经有11人回复
- 这样的审稿意见，大家见过吗？
已经有27人回复
4楼2010-09-11 10:32:19
3楼2010-09-11 10:28:30
polestar007
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.42
- 金币: 17388.8
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 3952
- 在线: 1099.4小时
- 虫号: 439293
- 注册: 2007-10-10
- 专业: 胶体与界面化学
5楼2010-09-11 10:37:47
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
6楼2010-09-11 10:39:08
