| ²é¿´: 473 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
wy_why007Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Í¶acta cry e±»¾Ü£¬×÷ÕßдµÄÒâ¼û£¬ÎÒ¸ÃÈçºÎ½â¾öËûÌáµÄÎÊÌ⣿ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Ͷacta cry e±»¾Ü£¬×÷ÕßдµÄÒâ¼û£¬ÎÒ¸ÃÈçºÎ½â¾öËûÌáµÄÎÊÌ⣿ ¸ÕͶacta cry e ±»¾Ü£¬Çó¸÷λ´óÏÀ°ï棡 ÏÂÁÐÊÇ×÷ÕßÌáµÄÒâ¼û£º There is a very strong O-H-O hydrogen bond in the structure - with the O...O distance about 2.42 \%A. The hydrogens are situated about the centre between these oxygens. However, the authors missed this fact because they inaptly constrained the hydrogen. The discussion is erroneous becuase the author misinterprete the shorter pertinent P-O distances. Moreover, the applied theta limit is too low for such a structure. Please remeasure the structure to higher theta angles. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ¼¼ÊõÑо¿ÔºÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢ÉúÎï¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢·ÄÖ¯¡¢»úеµÈרҵµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶӻ¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Ë¶Ê¿ÕÐÉú£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ180È˻ظ´
Ê×¶¼Ê¦·¶´óѧ»¯Ñ§ÏµÌïÑó¿ÎÌâ×éר˶Õе÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ãÖÝ´óѧ´óÍåÇø»·¾³Ñо¿Ôº»·¾³´ó·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÑо¿ËùÍõƽɽ½ÌÊÚÍÅ¶Ó 2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú¼òÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ìì½òÀí¹¤´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶÓ×îºó³å´Ì£¬Í¬Ñ§ÃDZð´í¹ýŶ£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
½Î÷¿Æ¼¼Ê¦·¶´óѧÎïÀí»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é½ÓÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬Ãû¶î»¹ÓУ¬ËÙÀ´
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
huahua1216
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- CMEI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 173 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.712
- ½ð±Ò: 39241.1
- É¢½ð: 1124
- ºì»¨: 22
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 15282
- ÔÚÏß: 449.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 260203
- ×¢²á: 2006-06-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ·ÅÉä·ÖÎö
2Â¥2010-07-26 08:55:40














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5