24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4036)
>导师招生 (339)
>休闲灌水 (170)
>招聘信息布告栏 (141)
>虫友互识 (124)
>论文道贺祈福 (113)
>文献求助 (100)
>硕博家园 (99)
>考研 (46)
>找工作 (45)
>考博 (42)
>基金申请 (41)
>博后之家 (31)
>生物科学 (29)
>教师之家 (22)
>论文投稿 (19)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yf625oscar

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 2932.8
散金: 1428
红花: 5
帖子: 759
在线: 116.7小时
虫号: 748811
注册: 2009-04-14
专业: 金属结构材料

[交流] 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不已有21人参与

Dear Mr ***
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' and editor's comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 3 months. Please note that this paper requires major revision. Reviewer 1 has major criticisms and recommended rejection, although I believe the paper can be brought to an acceptable standard by careful revision.

我看了下第一个审稿人的修改意见，其中有一个地方很难改，当时我看到一个现象（其实这个现象对我实验结果不是太重要），我就对这个现象做了个简单的解释，但是我用了“往往”这个词，结果审稿人要求我找出文献支持我的这种解释，我现在找不到，咋办啊？
另外还有一个审稿人给了句审稿意见：There is no indication of replicate experiments and a consideration of experimental error in this work.
说我没考虑实验的重复性，这个要怎么回复啊？

[ Last edited by yf625oscar on 2010-6-3 at 23:10 ]

回复此楼