| ²é¿´: 845 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
lanlan_zhuľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Çó·ÒëÉúÎïÀàÎÄÏ× ÓÐЧÆÚÖÁ2010Äê5ÔÂ31ÈÕ 20:00
|
||
|
DISCUSSION A. niger is used commercially in the production of a wide range of secreted enzymes and is being developed as a host for the secretion of heterologous enzymes (Archer & Peberdy, 1997; Gouka et al., 1997a). Despite the biotechnological importance of protein secretion in filamentous fungi, details of the secretory pathway are largely unknown. Much of our current knowledge regarding protein secretion has come from the study of temperature-sensitive secretion mutants in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Identification of several homologues in other eukaryotes, including A. niger (Veldhuisen et al., 1997), indicates that the process of protein secretion is highly conserved. It is a reasonable assumption therefore, that protein secretion in yeasts and filamentous fungi will share many features. However, the biological and orphological differences between these two groups suggest that additional proteins may be involved in the process of protein secretion in the fungal mycelium. This has been highlighted recently by the identification of an annexin homologue in Neurospora crassa which shares homology to the annexin gene family in higher eukaryotes but appears to be absent in S. cerevisiae (Braun et al., 1998). In a series of gene fusions we replaced the starch-binding domain of glucoamylase with sGFP to create fluorescent markers for the study of the secretion process in A. niger. Three glucoamylase sGFP fusions were made. Two of them were designed for secretion of the fusion protein and employed two different lengths of the glucoamylase protein (GLA499 and GLA514), although both constructs lacked the starch-binding domain. This approach has been used successfully to secrete heterologous proteins in both cases. The third construct included a C-terminal HDEL motif designed to retain the fusion protein within the lumen of the ER. The different lengths of glucoamylase in the secretory fusions were found to have no significant effect as both GLA499: :sGFP and GLA514: : sGFP produced the same patterns of fluorescence in A. niger, and were distinct from that of the ER-retained GLA514: : sGFP-HDELand the cytoplasmic-sGFP-containing strains. In young mycelia expressing the GLA: : sGFP fusion protein, bright fluorescence was observed in the hyphal walls indicating that the fusion protein was secreted, but retained within the cell wall. The presence of the fusion protein in the cell wall was confirmed by immuno-gold labelling. Retention of extracellular proteins in the hyphal wall has been reported previously for glucose oxidase in A. niger (Witteveen et al., 1992) and invertase in N. crassa (Trevithick & Metezenberg, 1966) and for a variety of secreted proteins in S. cerevisiae (de Nobel & Barnett, 1991). Using sGFP, we were able to directly observe in vivo the presence of the fusion protein within the cell wall, which would have been difficult based solely on Western analysis. We developed a simple extraction method that released the fusion protein from the cell wall. It is likely that in previous studies in which glucoamylase¡Àgene fusions have been used for heterologous protein secretion, cell wall localization was not recognized because the extraction method used did not discriminate between cell-wall-bound and intracellular proteins (Ward et al., 1990; Broekhuijsen et al., 1993; Archer et al., 1994; Gouka et al., 1997b).The more intense fluorescence observed at hyphal apices supports the hypothesis that secretion of the fusion protein takes place at the hyphal tips (Wo$ sten et al., 1991). However, as subapical regions of the cell wall were also fluorescent it appears that at least some of the GLA: : sGFP fusion protein is retained in the hyphal wall following secretion at the hyphal apex. Unexpectedly, septa were also brightly fluorescent, indicating the presence of GLA: : sGFP fusion protein. Since the formation of septa takes place independently of apical growth, the question arises of how septa become fluorescent. One explanation might be that the GLA: : sGFP fusion protein in the cell wall is trapped but freely diffusible within the extracellular matrix. Alternatively, the GLA : : sGFP fusion protein might be secreted during the formation of the septum. It is also possible that not all the secretion of the fusion protein is correlated with cell growth and that secretion also occurs in subapical cells without cell wall expansion. The effect of extracellular pH on fluorescence of the GLA: :sGFP-expressing strain compared to the GLA: : sGFP-HDEL strain also provides further evidence for the extracellular localization of GLA: : sGFP in the hyphal wall. Fluorescence of GFP has been shown to be sensitive to low pH, and below pH 5.0 loss of fluorescence may be irreversible (Kneen et al., 1998). The extracellular pH values of media of shake-flask cultures of A. niger have been shown to decrease to as low as 2.0 during growth (Archer et al., 1990). Low pH induces the production of proteases that are known to affect yields of heterologous proteins (Archer & Peberdy, 1997; Gouka et al., 1997a; van den Homberg et al., 1997). Extracellular proteases probably account for the degradation of the GLA: : sGFP fusion proteins in the culture supernatant, even in soya milk medium where degradation of sGFP was found to occur at a slower rate than in defined medium. Cleavage of the GLA: :sGFP fusion protein appeared to occur initially within the linker region between the glucoamylase and sGFP as cleaved sGFP with an apparent molecular mass of 27 kDa (the expected molecular mass for intact sGFP) was detected by Western analysis after 4 d growth in soya milk medium. Cleavage of the glucoamylase fusion protein at or near to the fusion junction has been reported for other heterologous proteins, even in the absence of a recognized processing site (Roberts et al., 1992). Further degradation of sGFP in the supernatant was indicated by the loss of detectable amounts of sGFP after 6 d. The D15 mutant, which has a reduced ability to acidify the medium, was able to sustain extracellular wall fluorescence for longer than AB4.1. The data suggest that the GLA: : sGFP fusion constructs can be used to monitor protein secretion in fermenters as long as the pH is held above pH 6¡À0. It may also be possible to use the GLA: : sGFP-expressing strain to screen for additional protease-deficient mutants. Taken together, the results indicate that in young mycelia the GLA: :sGFP fusion protein is primarily secreted at hyphal tips but partly retained within the cell wall, resulting in wall fluorescence. In older mycelia, extracellular wall fluorescence is lost as a result of the acidification of the culture medium and proteolytic degradation, possibly by acidinduced proteases. Fig. 6. Secretion occurs at the hyphal tips. Young germlings of A. niger AB4.1 G514: :sGFP grown for (a) 20 h and (b) 28 h showing apical localization and loss of subapical wall fluorescence. Bar, 20 ¦Ìm. Fig. 7. (a) Growth of untransformed A. niger AB4.1 (+) and G499: :sGFP (E) on soya milk medium containing 1% (w/v) maltodextrin for 10 d, and the relative fluorescence of extracellular culture supernatant samples from AB4.1 (U) and G499: :sGFP (o). (b) Western blot analysis (i) using anti-sGFP antibodies of extracellular culture supernatant samples from A. niger AB4.1 G499: :sGFP grown on soya milk medium for 4, 6, 8 and 10 d (lanes 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively) and showing the GLA : :sGFP fusion protein and (ii) using anti-glucoamylase (left panel) and anti-sGFP (right panel) antibodies on samples of culture filtrate from A. niger G499: :sGFP (lane 1) and AB4.1 (lane 2) after 4 d growth on soya milk medium, demonstrating that the protein band with the highest molecular mass is the GLA: :sGFP fusion protein. ÎÒÍíÉϾÍÒª£¬Ï£Íû´ó¼Ò¶à¶à°ïæ¡£ÎÒʵÔÚûʱ¼äÈ¥·Ò롣ллÁË¡£ [ Last edited by lanlan_zhu on 2010-5-31 at 11:49 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÏÃÃÅ´óѧ£¬ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©£¬×Ü·Ö272£¬±¾¿Æ211
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ ½ÄÏ´óѧ 085602 »¯¹¤×¨Ë¶ 338·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
0854µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢319Çóµ÷¼Á£¨½ÓÊÜ¿çרҵµ÷¼Á£©
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
yangyanming
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- ·ÒëEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 88.6
- Ìû×Ó: 27
- ÔÚÏß: 5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1005470
- ×¢²á: 2010-04-25
¡ï ¡ï
wypward(½ð±Ò+2):»¶Óг棬лл²ÎÓë 2010-05-31 16:26:41
lanlan_zhu(½ð±Ò+1, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2010-06-01 19:47:18
lanlan_zhu(½ð±Ò+99): 2010-06-01 19:47:23
wypward(½ð±Ò+2):»¶Óг棬лл²ÎÓë 2010-05-31 16:26:41
lanlan_zhu(½ð±Ò+1, ·ÒëEPI+1): 2010-06-01 19:47:18
lanlan_zhu(½ð±Ò+99): 2010-06-01 19:47:23
|
ÓÉÓÚ·ÒëµÄ±È½Ï´Òæ »áÓÐһЩÓÐЩ³öÈëµÄµØ·½²»Ì«ÕýÈ·£¬Çë¼ûÁ £¬¿É¹©²Î¿¼¡£ ÌÖÂÛ ºÚÇúù£¬ÊÇÓÃÓÚÉÌÒµ£¬ÊÇÒ»¸öÉú²ú¸÷ÖÖøµÄ·ÖÃÚ£¬Ä¿Ç°ÕýÔÚ×÷ΪÍâԴøµÄ·ÖÃÚÖ÷Òª¿ª·¢ (Archer & Peberdy, 1997; Gouka et al., 1997a)¡£ ¾¡¹ÜÔÚË¿×´Õæ¾ú·ÖÃÚµ°°×ÉúÎï¼¼ÊõÓÐÖØÒªÐÔ£¬·ÖÃÚ;¾¶Ï¸½ÚÔںܴó³Ì¶ÈÉÏÊÇδ֪¡£ÎÒÃÇĿǰµÄ֪ʶ¶ÔÓÚµ°°×ÖʵķÖÃÚÓкܶàÀ´×ÔÓÚ¶ÔζÈÃô¸ÐÍ»±äÌå·ÖÃÚÑо¿ÔÚÄð¾ÆµÄ½ÍĸÖС£¼ø¶¨Í¬Ô´ÆäËû¼¸¸öÕæºËÉúÎ°üÀ¨ºÚÇúù£¨Veldhuisen et al.1997£© ±íÃ÷¸Ãµ°°×ÖʵķÖÃÚ¹ý³ÌÊǸ߶ȱ£Êصġ£ÕâÊÇÒ»¸öºÏÀíµÄ¼ÙÉ裬Òò´Ë£¬ÔÚ½Íĸµ°°×·ÖÃÚºÍË¿×´Õæ¾ú½«ÓÐÐí¶àÌØµã¡£È»¶ø£¬ÕâÁ½¸öȺÌåÖ®¼äµÄÉúÎïºÍorphological²îÒì±íÃ÷£¬¶îÍâµÄµ°°×ÖÊ¿ÉÄÜÔÚµ°°×ÖʵķÖÃÚ¹ý³ÌÖÐÉæ¼°µÄÕæ¾ú¾úË¿¡£ÕâÊÇÍ»³öÇ¿µ÷ÁËÔÚ´Ö²ÚÂöæß¾úĤÁªµ°°×ͬԴ»ùÒòͬԴÐÔµÄ¹ÉÆ±µÄĤÁªµ°°×»ùÒò¼Ò×åÔڸߵÈÕæºËÉúÎµ«ËƺõÊÇÔÚSȱϯ½Íĸ£¨²¼ÀʵÈÈË×î½ü¼ø¶¨¡££¬1998£©¡£ ÔÚÎÒÃǵĻùÒòÈÚºÏϵÁÐÈ¡´úÁ˵í·ÛÌÇ»¯Ã¸ÓësGFP½áºÏÓò´´ÔìÁËÔÚºÚÇúù·ÖÃÚ¹ý³ÌµÄÑо¿Ó«¹â±ê¼Ç¡£ ÆäÖÐÁ½Î»ÊÇרΪÈںϵ°°×µÄ·ÖÃÚ£¬²¢¹ÍÓÃÁ½ÃûÌÇ»¯Ã¸µ°°×£¨GLA499ºÍGLA514²»Í¬³¤¶È£©£¬ËäÈ»Á½Õ߽ṹȱ·¦µí·Û½áºÏÓò¡£ÕâÖÖ·½·¨Òѳɹ¦µØÓÃÓÚÔÚÁ½ÖÖÇé¿öÏ·ÖÃÚÍâÔ´µ°°×¡£µÚÈý¸ö¹¹Ôì°üÀ¨Ò»¸öC -Ä©¶ËHDELÖ÷Ì⣬ּÔÚ±£Áô·¶Î§ÄÚµÄÄÚÖÊÍøÇ»µÄÈںϵ°°×¡£ÌÇ»¯Ã¸ÖзÖÃÚÈںϲ»Í¬³¤¶È±»·¢ÏÖÓÐÁ½¸öGLA499ûÓÐÏÔ×ŵÄЧ¹û£ºGLA514£º£ºsGFPÔÚºÚÇúù²úÉúÓ«¹âÏàͬµÄģʽ£¬²¢´ÓÕâÒ»¶ÀÌØµÄER -±£ÁôGLA514£ºÔÚÇàÄê±íʾGLAµÄ¾úË¿£º£ºsGFPÈںϵ°°×£¬Ã÷ÁÁµÄÓ«¹â¹Û²ìÏÔʾ£¬¸ÃÈںϵ°°×·ÖÃڵľúË¿±Ú£¬µ«ÔÚϸ°û±Ú±£Áô¡£ÔÚϸ°û±ÚÖеÄÈںϵ°°×µÄ´æÔÚ֤ʵÁËÃâÒß½ð±ê¼Ç¡£°ûÍâµ°°×±£ÁôÔÚ¾úË¿±ÚÒѱ»±¨¸æ¹ý£¬ÆÏÌÑÌÇÑõ»¯Ã¸µÄºÚÇúù£¨Î¬Ìطҵȡ££¬1992Ä꣩ºÍ±±Â·´Ö²ÚÂöæß¾ú£¨ÌØÀïάÎ÷¿Ë£¦Metezenberg£¬1966ÄêÕáÌÇ£©ºÍÒ»¶ÔÄð¾Æ½Íĸ£¨µÂŵ±´¶û£¦°ÍÄáÌØ£¬1991£©·ÖÃÚ¶àÖÖµ°°×ÖÊ¡£Ê¹ÓÃsGFP£¬ÎÒÃÇÄܹ»Ö±½Ó¹Û²ì»îÌåϸ°ûÄÚµÄǽ±Ú£¬Èںϵ°°×µÄ´æÔÚ£¬½«ÓÐÄÑÒÔÍêÈ«¸ù¾ÝÎ÷·½·ÖÎö¡£ÎÒÃÇ¿ª·¢Ò»¸ö¼òµ¥µÄÌáÈ¡·½·¨£¬Êͷųöϸ°û±ÚµÄÈںϵ°°×¡£ºÜ¿ÉÄÜÔÚÆäÖÐÌÇ»¯Ã¸¡À»ùÒòÈÚºÏÒÔÍùµÄÑо¿ÒѾÓÃÒìÔ´µ°°×µÄ·ÖÃÚ£¬Ï¸°û±ÚµÄ¶¨Î»ÊDz»³ÐÈÏ£¬ÒòΪûÓÐÓÃÝÍÈ¡·¨Ö®¼äµÄϸ°û±ÚºÍϸ°ûÄÚµ°°×ÖʵÄÔ¼ÊøÆçÊÓ(Archer & Peberdy, 1997; Gouka et al., 1997a; van den Homberg et al., 1997). ¡£°ûÍâµ°°×ø¿ÉÄÜΪGLAµÄÍË»¯£ºÔÚÅàÑøÉÏÇåsGFPÈںϵ°°×£¬¼´Ê¹ÔÚ¶¹½¬Öеĵط½±»·¢ÏÖµÄsGFPÍË»¯·¢ÉúÔÚ±ÈÖж¨ÒåµÄËٶȽÏÂýÂÑÁѵÄGLAµÄ£º£ºsGFPÈںϵ°°×ËÆºõ·¢ÉúÔÚÌÇ»¯Ã¸Ö®¼äµÄºÍ×÷Ϊһ¸öÃ÷ÏÔµÄÇиî·Ö×ÓÁ¿27 kDaµÄÁ¬½ÓÆ÷sGFP sGFPµØÇø×î³õ£¨Ô¤¼Æ·Ö×ÓÖÊÁ¿ÎªÍêÕûsGFP£©Î÷·½·ÖÎö¼ì²âºó4 dµÄ¶¹½¬ÖÐÉú³¤¡£¶Ô´ïµ½»ò½Ó½üÌÇ»¯Ã¸Èںϵ°°×Áѽ⽻½ç´¦µÄÈÚºÏÒѾ¹«²¼ÁËÆäËûÍâÔ´µ°°×£¬¼´Ê¹ÔÚÒ»¸ö¹«Èϵļӹ¤µã£¨ÂÞ²®´ÄµÈÈ˵ÄÇé¿öÏ£¬¡££¬1992£©½øÒ»²½ÍË»¯µÄsGFPÉÏÇåÒºÖÐÔø±íʾ£¬¼ì³öµÄsGFPËðʧ½ð¶îËĺóÁùÔÚD15ÖÐÍ»±äÌ壬ËüÓÐÒ»¸öËữÄÜÁ¦Ï½µµÄ½éÖÊ£¬ÄÜά³Ö³¬¹ýAB4.1°û±ÚÓ«¹â¡£ÕâЩÊý¾Ý±íÃ÷£¬ÑÇÂéË᣺£ºsGFPÈںϽṹ£¬¿ÉÓÃÓÚ¼à²â·¢½Íµ°°×·ÖÃÚ£¬Ö»Òª³ÖÓÐÒÔÉÏ£¬pHÖµpHÖµ6 ¡À 0¡£ËüÒ²¿ÉÒÔʹÓÃGLAµÄ£º£ºsGFP±íÏֵľúÖêɸѡ¶îÍâµ°°×øȱʧͻ±äÌå¡£Á½Õߺϼƣ¬½á¹û±íÃ÷£¬ÔÚÄêÇáµÄGLAµÄ¾úË¿sGFPÈںϵ°°×Ö÷ÒªÊÇÔÚ¾úË¿·ÖÃÚµÄÌáʾ£¬µ«²¿·ÖÔÚϸ°û±Ú±£ÁôÔÚǽ±ÚÔì³ÉÓ«¹âÔڽϾɵľúË¿Ì壬°û±ÚÓ«¹â¶ªÊ§×÷ΪÅàÑøÒººÍµ°°×Ë®½âËữ½µ½âµÄ½á¹û£¬¿ÉÄÜÓÉacidinducedµ°°×ø¡£Í¼¡£ 6¡£·ÖÃÚ·¢ÉúÔÚ¾úË¿Ìáʾ¡£ÑîÝæÔåÓ×Ãç¶ÔºÚÇúùAB4.1 G514£º£ºsGFP³É³¤Îª£¨1£©20 hºÍ£¨¶þ£©28 ĤÏÔʾ¸ù¼â¶¨Î»ºÍ¸ù¼âϱÚÓ«¹âËðʧ¡£¾Æ°É£¬20΢Ãס£Í¼¡£ 7¡£ £¨Ò»Î´×ª»ùÒòºÚÇúù£©Ôö³¤AB4.1£¨+£©ºÍG499£º£ºsGFP£¨E£©¶Ô¶¹½¬Öк¬ÓÐ1£¥£¨ÍßÌØ/ v£©Îª10 dºÍÎÄ»¯µÄÏà¶ÔÓ«¹âϸ°ûÍâÒº´ÓÑùÆ·ÂóÑ¿ºý¾«AB4.1£¨U£©ºÍG499£º£ºsGFP£¨º£Í⣩¡£ £¨¶þ£©ÃâÒßÓ¡¼£·ÖÎö£¨Ò»£©Ê¹ÓÃÍâÎÄ»¯·´sGFP¿¹Ìå´ÓºÚÇúùÉÏÇåÑùÆ·AB4.1 G499£ºsGFPÉú³¤ÔÚ¶¹½¬ÖÐ4£¬6£¬8ºÍ10 d£¨Í¨µÀ1£¬2£¬3ºÍ4·Ö±ð£©ºÍÏÔʾsGFPÈںϵ°°×¼°£¨ii£©ÀûÓ÷´ÌÇ»¯Ã¸£¨×ó²àÃæ°å£©ºÍÎÄ»¯Ñù±¾·´sGFP£¨ÓÒͼ£©¿¹ÌåÂËÒº´ÓºÚÇúùG499£ºsGFP£¨Ïß1£©ºÍAB4.1£¨ºó2Ïï4 D¶Ô¶¹½¬ÖÐÔö³¤£©£¬±íÃ÷¾ßÓÐ×î¸ß·Ö×ÓÁ¿µ°°×Ìõ´ø£¬ÊÇÑÇÂéË᣺£ºsGFPÈںϵ°°×¡£ |
2Â¥2010-05-31 14:40:07
lanlan_zhu
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3914.3
- Ìû×Ó: 1116
- ÔÚÏß: 109.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 361700
- ×¢²á: 2007-05-04
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò©Îï·ÖÎö
3Â¥2010-05-31 16:16:50














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥