24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 460  |  回复: 2

lqhcxx

铜虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 有必要进一步修改吗? 已有2人参与

大家好,投一篇论文,经修改后再次提交,然后编辑给我下面的回信,请问我还有进一步修改的必要吗?还有录用的可能性吗?


Dear Dr Chen

Thank you for sending the revised version of your paper.  I think that the major criticism of one the second reviewer is still valid, ie:

You conclude that if the time step is small the matrix A can be considered as constant in spite of the time variation of F(t).

You will need to present some justification of how to determine the time step in function of the variation of F(t) as otherwise the scheme will only be valid for the case of slow varying functions.

The reviewer also mentioned that the numerical tests presented in your paper are not very challenging.  Have you run other cases?

Yours sincerely


Prof C A Brebbia
Editor in Chief, EABE Journal
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenlj8331

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
可以进行修改。但审稿人对你论文的评价不高呀。
2楼2010-05-19 15:22:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leikey

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
有希望就不要放弃
THU
3楼2010-05-19 16:06:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lqhcxx 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见