24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xujinxia

木虫 (著名写手)

我是谁？

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 681.1
散金: 5562
红花: 16
帖子: 1071
在线: 4837.7小时
虫号: 398862
注册: 2007-06-11
性别: GG
专业: 其他无机非金属材料

[交流] 帮我看看论文返回意见，审稿了吗？已有32人参与

下面是我的返回意见：

Dear Mr. Xu Jinxia,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/conbuildmat/ and login as an Author.
Your username is: ******
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/CONBUILDMAT/automail_query.asp

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely,

M Ohtsu
Regional Editor
Construction and Building Materials

Reviewers' comments:

The paper is not well written in English.  Thorough revision is neccesary.
In addition, the following amendmenst are requested.
1. " representaion" is not recommended as a technical term.  "index", "parameter" or "factor" is suggested.
2. Are the chemical compositions of steel correct, as the percentage of weight at page 4? By the way,, "wt%" is not recommended.
3. What is "analytical reagent grade" ? It is not internationally used.
4. Configuration of the specimen is missing.
5. All chemical values are to be estimated prior to immersion.  Otherwise, they are not to be compared.
6. Do niot start the sentense with abbreviation as "Fig.".
7. At page 8, -- NaCl are few than -- ?  not readable.
8. What are physical or chemical meaning of an approximated equations in Fig. 2. It acutally is useless.
9. Do not carelessly use "future tense" in a scientific paper.
10. I table 2, total chloride values are different from Fig. 5.

我是3月26日投的稿，写信催了以后，一个星期后才给的论文号，后一直显示的状态是with editor,最近几天，连续写了2封催稿信，昨天晚上收到的上述意见，现在在线状态“revise"。
我搞不清楚的是，不知道这个意见是送审后的评审意见，还是我资格审查的意见（并没有送审，只是语法检查），因为评审意见中似乎只有语法上的和一些细节上笔误！
此外，我的投稿刊物是elsevier的刊物Construction and Building Materials，日本的编辑！

谢谢！

[ Last edited by xujinxia on 2010-5-1 at 07:59 ]

回复此楼