| 查看: 811 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
(决对原创)我一篇投稿文章的审稿人意见 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewer #2: This is a very interesting ****study with quite intriguing results that is significantly marred by bad grammar and poor organization. Fortunately for the author I believe the same errors are repeated over and over again, so with some judicious use of cut and paste, most could be fixed with little effort. The only reason I waded through the confusing details of this paper to get to the scientifically interesting nuggets was that the authors seem to have put together a nice combination of *** and the results were pretty conclusive and should lead to further development in this area. So I will only list my suggested revisions of a scientific nature that will in my opinion make the paper more accurate and acceptable to others in the field. I will refrain from making some much-needed suggestions of a more editorial nature, but instead leave any decisions about importance of grammar and organization to the discretion of the journal editor and staff. In general, the authors need to be careful not to over generalize their (very nice) results, and to clearly distinguish between what they actually proved experimentally in this study from what they think the future implications of their work will be. This is a research article, not a grant application!!! 老外写得很有意思，也了解自己英语水平很poor [ Last edited by lby1258 on 2010-6-4 at 21:41 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有10人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
26博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
被我言中：新模板不强调格式了，假专家开始管格式了
已经有4人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 【原创非首发】诗词中典故浅议
已经有10人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
3楼2010-04-28 16:25:04
