24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3325  |  回复: 36
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

phoenix810

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] ACS 投稿返回意见交流(散金币) 已有36人参与

投稿到ACS Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research今天收到审稿意见如下:
reviewer1:
Summary Recommendation:
Publishable paper; requires substantial revisions and shortening as indicated and then
publish as a short note (see detailed comment b below). No re-review recommended.
貌似叫我缩写。最后一句话什么意思?改完之后不用再审了?

Recommendation:
The authors use the single objective particle swarm algorithm (PSA) of Shi and
Eberhart to optimize a single plate-fin heat exchanger. I have reservations on this ms., but still recommend its publication as a short note (but only after a substantial re-writing and shortening as described below).

Detailed Comments:
a) Page 2: The authors mention that though several papers exist on the design of heat
exchangers (HXs), nothing much is available on their optimization [“... do not consist of any
optimization strategies that are needed …”]. This is just NOT true. See, for example:
Agarwal, A. and Gupta, S. K., Jumping Gene Adaptations of NSGA-II and
Their Use in the Multi-objective Optimal Design of Shell and Tube Heat
Exchangers, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 86, 123-139 (2008).
A. Jiminez et al., Indus. Eng. Chem. Res., recent issue
The authors need to look at papers in Chemical Engineering journals and expand their
literature survey to beyond the restricted confines of Mechanical Engineering. In fact,
a considerable amount of optimization using more than a single objective function
has also been reported, as also the multi-objective optimization (MOO) of Heat
Exchanger networks (the heuristic pinch algorithm, now using multi-objective GA),
etc. The authors seem to be blissfully unaware of all this work in the literature of heat
exchanger optimization.

b) I believe that the days of optimizing simple problems involving only a single
objective function are long over. The two articles mentioned above use the very
detailed Bell-Delaware method to estimate/size the HX (though not for plate-fin
HXs), and then to optimize it using more than one objective function (multi-objective
optimization, MOO). Indeed, the authors talk a bit about the possibility of a Pareto set
of non-dominated (equally good or optimal) solutions on page 14 of their ms.,
without realizing that this reflects two points of a Pareto set for a two-objective
function problem, and MOO algorithms can be used to study this more effectively.
Hence, I find this ms. far too elementary for publication in IECRes, except as a short
note.

c) Several references have ‘et al.’ This is possibly not acceptable to a journal, I believe,
and all authors need be mentioned.

d) The language needs substantial improvement.

reviewer2:
Comments to the Author
To demonstrate the improvement proposed, authors should compare their results against PSO methodologies proposed by others. In this paper, it seems that the convergence is achieved by fixed number of evaluations. Can this guarantee optimum for any problem? Conclusion of the paper should be improved to account physical significance of the problem.
审稿人2好像没什么意见,有没有人能把Can this guarantee optimum for any problem? 这句话什么意思翻译看看啊?

请大家帮忙看看,多谢了!


PS:文章修好后,一个礼拜顺利录用,感谢大家无私的帮助!

[ Last edited by phoenix810 on 2010-5-6 at 16:26 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yccycc

木虫 (著名写手)


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
Can this guarantee optimum for any problem?
就是说用这个方法也能解决其他问题吗
3楼2010-04-26 04:51:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 37 个回答

johnsonzhang

金虫 (小有名气)


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜楼主。

1,应该是小修;
2,与其他方法比较,是否是解决这类问题的最佳方案。

供参考
2楼2010-04-25 22:20:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜
5楼2010-04-26 07:13:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜恭喜,沾点喜气O(∩_∩)O~
8楼2010-04-26 07:46:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +3 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-10 07:46 by gaohui8888
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +4 布布和一二 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-09 22:24 by otj2008
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[考博] 【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向 20+3 13586093586 2026-08-03 5/250 2026-08-08 21:54 by 13586093586
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +3 布布和一二 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-08 17:46 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 基金中了 +14 laoda193707 2026-08-06 14/700 2026-08-08 00:23 by 实验小白ha
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 娱乐 +6 Tide man 2026-08-03 6/300 2026-08-07 22:40 by 铁帽子农民
[基金申请] 固定端突然变了,今天 +6 archvillain 2026-08-06 10/500 2026-08-07 16:03 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 听说今天filecode变了 +24 布布和一二 2026-08-06 47/2350 2026-08-07 16:02 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode +14 等待解的谜 2026-08-06 19/950 2026-08-07 12:20 by wlwhappy
[基金申请] filecode +8 布布和一二 2026-08-06 11/550 2026-08-06 20:41 by tangpu318
[基金申请] 求各位大神看下 100+6 hpkpkpkp 2026-08-05 33/1650 2026-08-06 14:49 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] 影响面上的因素 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-05 11/550 2026-08-06 10:41 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 好消息?这个有何含义??? +8 Tide man 2026-08-05 10/500 2026-08-05 16:14 by xmuxiaoyu
[基金申请] 纯娱乐,不喜欢勿喷 +7 Tide man 2026-08-04 10/500 2026-08-04 15:10 by loufangrui
信息提示
请填处理意见