24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3359  |  回复: 36
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

phoenix810

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] ACS 投稿返回意见交流(散金币) 已有36人参与

投稿到ACS Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research今天收到审稿意见如下:
reviewer1:
Summary Recommendation:
Publishable paper; requires substantial revisions and shortening as indicated and then
publish as a short note (see detailed comment b below). No re-review recommended.
貌似叫我缩写。最后一句话什么意思?改完之后不用再审了?

Recommendation:
The authors use the single objective particle swarm algorithm (PSA) of Shi and
Eberhart to optimize a single plate-fin heat exchanger. I have reservations on this ms., but still recommend its publication as a short note (but only after a substantial re-writing and shortening as described below).

Detailed Comments:
a) Page 2: The authors mention that though several papers exist on the design of heat
exchangers (HXs), nothing much is available on their optimization [“... do not consist of any
optimization strategies that are needed …”]. This is just NOT true. See, for example:
Agarwal, A. and Gupta, S. K., Jumping Gene Adaptations of NSGA-II and
Their Use in the Multi-objective Optimal Design of Shell and Tube Heat
Exchangers, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 86, 123-139 (2008).
A. Jiminez et al., Indus. Eng. Chem. Res., recent issue
The authors need to look at papers in Chemical Engineering journals and expand their
literature survey to beyond the restricted confines of Mechanical Engineering. In fact,
a considerable amount of optimization using more than a single objective function
has also been reported, as also the multi-objective optimization (MOO) of Heat
Exchanger networks (the heuristic pinch algorithm, now using multi-objective GA),
etc. The authors seem to be blissfully unaware of all this work in the literature of heat
exchanger optimization.

b) I believe that the days of optimizing simple problems involving only a single
objective function are long over. The two articles mentioned above use the very
detailed Bell-Delaware method to estimate/size the HX (though not for plate-fin
HXs), and then to optimize it using more than one objective function (multi-objective
optimization, MOO). Indeed, the authors talk a bit about the possibility of a Pareto set
of non-dominated (equally good or optimal) solutions on page 14 of their ms.,
without realizing that this reflects two points of a Pareto set for a two-objective
function problem, and MOO algorithms can be used to study this more effectively.
Hence, I find this ms. far too elementary for publication in IECRes, except as a short
note.

c) Several references have ‘et al.’ This is possibly not acceptable to a journal, I believe,
and all authors need be mentioned.

d) The language needs substantial improvement.

reviewer2:
Comments to the Author
To demonstrate the improvement proposed, authors should compare their results against PSO methodologies proposed by others. In this paper, it seems that the convergence is achieved by fixed number of evaluations. Can this guarantee optimum for any problem? Conclusion of the paper should be improved to account physical significance of the problem.
审稿人2好像没什么意见,有没有人能把Can this guarantee optimum for any problem? 这句话什么意思翻译看看啊?

请大家帮忙看看,多谢了!


PS:文章修好后,一个礼拜顺利录用,感谢大家无私的帮助!

[ Last edited by phoenix810 on 2010-5-6 at 16:26 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yccycc

木虫 (著名写手)


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
Can this guarantee optimum for any problem?
就是说用这个方法也能解决其他问题吗
3楼2010-04-26 04:51:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 37 个回答

johnsonzhang

金虫 (小有名气)


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜楼主。

1,应该是小修;
2,与其他方法比较,是否是解决这类问题的最佳方案。

供参考
2楼2010-04-25 22:20:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜
5楼2010-04-26 07:13:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s


phoenix810(金币+1):谢谢参与
恭喜恭喜,沾点喜气O(∩_∩)O~
8楼2010-04-26 07:46:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 yPv6ndDtiRxQ 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 20:39 by thgx1vqMqrLw
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +8 Tide man 2026-08-10 9/450 2026-08-11 20:39 by beefly
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 yPv6ndDtiRxQ 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:15 by CLKTSgjM0Uqj
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +3 布布和一二 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 15:20 by aasahr
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +7 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-11 10:50 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +8 家与远方 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 09:49 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +10 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 11/550 2026-08-10 18:47 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-08 5/250 2026-08-10 14:20 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
信息提示
请填处理意见