24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者枯叶飘零的 6 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

枯叶飘零

木虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1508.8
帖子: 46
在线: 11.1小时
虫号: 339467
注册: 2007-04-07
性别: GG
专业: 设施园艺学

[交流] 大家帮忙给看看：编辑拒稿，但是表示感兴趣，可以重新投稿？已有20人参与

文章其实内容一般，不够新意，但是投的同领域影响较高的期刊

这是编辑给我的信，个人比较迷惑，大家帮我看看，另外这个文章里面语法错误不计其数，一个审稿人改得很详细，另外一个的意见则是模棱两可。

敬请大家指导指导

信件如下：

Dear .....,

I have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript PLSO6714 ...

Both of them agree that your study is interesting but also express a number of concerns, particularly about the description of the methods and the interpretation of the data, which need substantial rewriting prior to publication. Therefore, I formally reject your manuscript. However, I would like to stress that the data and topic are of interest to Plant and Soil and I encourage you to submit a new manuscript which has been carefully revised according to all comments and questions by the reviewers. Please include in your cover letter your response to each comment, and indicate which modifications were made to the manuscript.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

With kind regards,
.....

Reviewer #1:

Review: PLSO6714

Title: delete "A comparative study on"

.....

Reviewer #2: REFEREE'S REPORT

MANUSCRIPT: PLSO6714

TITLE: "A comparative study on physiological and.....
AUTHORS: ....

General Report:
This manuscript deals with the effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on several aspects of melon plants physiology under water deficit. Authors describe effects on plant development, antioxidant enzymes, soluble sugars and photosynthetic parameters. However, I consider that the paper is merely descriptive of the effects of a treatment on a number of plants processes. In addition, the manuscript is not very elaborate, with many grammatical errors and several inconsistencies in its presentation. The reasons for this opinion are given below.

Major comments

The introduction section is unfocused and consists of several paragraphs without a clear connection. It should be more focused on the topic under research and follow a logical order to justify the investigation carried out.

回复此楼