24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1984  |  回复: 23
当前主题已经存档。
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 枯叶飘零 的 6 个金币

枯叶飘零

木虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 大家帮忙给看看:编辑拒稿,但是表示感兴趣,可以重新投稿?已有20人参与

文章其实内容一般,不够新意,但是投的同领域影响较高的期刊

这是编辑给我的信,个人比较迷惑,大家帮我看看,另外这个文章里面语法错误不计其数,一个审稿人改得很详细,另外一个的意见则是模棱两可。

敬请大家指导指导

信件如下:

Dear .....,

I have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript PLSO6714 ...

Both of them agree that your study is interesting but also express a number of concerns, particularly about the description of the methods and the interpretation of the data, which need substantial rewriting prior to publication. Therefore, I formally reject your manuscript. However, I would like to stress that the data and topic are of interest to Plant and Soil and I encourage you to submit a new manuscript which has been carefully revised according to all comments and questions by the reviewers. Please include in your cover letter your response to each comment, and indicate which modifications were made to the manuscript.
Below, please find the comments for your perusal.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

With kind regards,
.....


Reviewer #1:

Review: PLSO6714

Title: delete "A comparative study on"

.....

Reviewer #2: REFEREE'S REPORT

MANUSCRIPT: PLSO6714

TITLE: "A comparative study on physiological and.....
AUTHORS: ....

General Report:
       This manuscript deals with the effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on several aspects of melon plants physiology under water deficit. Authors describe effects on plant development, antioxidant enzymes, soluble sugars and photosynthetic parameters. However, I consider that the paper is merely descriptive of the effects of a treatment on a number of plants processes. In addition, the manuscript is not very elaborate, with many grammatical errors and several inconsistencies in its presentation. The reasons for this opinion are given below.

Major comments

The introduction section is unfocused and consists of several paragraphs without a clear connection. It should be more focused on the topic under research and follow a logical order to justify the investigation carried out.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

枯叶飘零(金币+1):有过相似的经历吗?我的文章是菌根抗旱的,你能不能推荐几个期刊?谢谢 2010-04-15 09:48
这个不要想,当然重投了!
2楼2010-04-15 09:40:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rizhichen

金虫 (正式写手)

枯叶飘零(金币+1):首次投稿,文章语法错误很多,修改后你觉得希望大吗?谢谢你的帮助 2010-04-15 09:47
重投就有希望
3楼2010-04-15 09:40:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yangxs2002

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
枯叶飘零(金币+1):因为是首次投稿,文章语法错误很多,修改后你觉得希望大吗?谢谢你的帮助 2010-04-15 09:46
仔细、认真修改!好好回答审稿人的意见,会给个大修的
4楼2010-04-15 09:41:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuliunumber

铜虫 (小有名气)

大修改
5楼2010-04-15 09:48:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

枯叶飘零

木虫 (初入文坛)

初次投稿,导师也没帮啥忙,完全自己弄的,语法错误很多,惭愧呀
6楼2010-04-15 09:50:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lingyun79

木虫 (著名写手)

枯叶飘零(金币+1):谢谢!! 2010-04-15 09:51
严格按照审稿人的意见仔细修改后重新投稿,应该没问题
最好能找几个熟悉领域的人帮忙修改一下
7楼2010-04-15 09:50:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzdxpyy300

铜虫 (正式写手)

好好努力
8楼2010-04-15 09:51:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

doctall23

木虫 (著名写手)


枯叶飘零(金币+1):谢谢,认真是必须的,接收是心里没底的:) 2010-04-15 09:58
认认真真,实实在在,努努力力的改,应该接收没有问题。
9楼2010-04-15 09:52:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

imrsyy

银虫 (正式写手)

枯叶飘零(金币+1):谢谢 2010-04-15 10:02
相当于大大修,但重投时要注意cover letter 里要写明你对修改意见的看法(Please include in your cover letter your response to each comment, and indicate which modifications were made to the manuscript)
祝楼主好运,加油啊,靠自己写出来的文章才更有成就感的!
10楼2010-04-15 09:56:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 枯叶飘零 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见