| 查看: 1976 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 枯叶飘零 的 6 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家帮忙给看看：编辑拒稿，但是表示感兴趣，可以重新投稿？已有20人参与
|
|||
|
文章其实内容一般，不够新意，但是投的同领域影响较高的期刊 这是编辑给我的信，个人比较迷惑，大家帮我看看，另外这个文章里面语法错误不计其数，一个审稿人改得很详细，另外一个的意见则是模棱两可。 敬请大家指导指导 信件如下： Dear ....., I have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript PLSO6714 ... Both of them agree that your study is interesting but also express a number of concerns, particularly about the description of the methods and the interpretation of the data, which need substantial rewriting prior to publication. Therefore, I formally reject your manuscript. However, I would like to stress that the data and topic are of interest to Plant and Soil and I encourage you to submit a new manuscript which has been carefully revised according to all comments and questions by the reviewers. Please include in your cover letter your response to each comment, and indicate which modifications were made to the manuscript. Below, please find the comments for your perusal. I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration. With kind regards, ..... Reviewer #1: Review: PLSO6714 Title: delete "A comparative study on" ..... Reviewer #2: REFEREE'S REPORT MANUSCRIPT: PLSO6714 TITLE: "A comparative study on physiological and..... AUTHORS: .... General Report: This manuscript deals with the effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on several aspects of melon plants physiology under water deficit. Authors describe effects on plant development, antioxidant enzymes, soluble sugars and photosynthetic parameters. However, I consider that the paper is merely descriptive of the effects of a treatment on a number of plants processes. In addition, the manuscript is not very elaborate, with many grammatical errors and several inconsistencies in its presentation. The reasons for this opinion are given below. Major comments The introduction section is unfocused and consists of several paragraphs without a clear connection. It should be more focused on the topic under research and follow a logical order to justify the investigation carried out. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申请2026年博士
已经有5人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有5人回复
-
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有6人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有6人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有6人回复
-
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
-
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
枯叶飘零(金币+1):谢谢 2010-04-15 10:01
|
肯定要好好改，不过，这个编辑应该欣赏你的文章。改投的话，重来一遍，在碰到这种编辑的几率不高。 推荐你看看这个贴： http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1917936 文章被拒之后的选择 - 申诉，重投，改投？ |
11楼2010-04-15 09:57:31
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-04-15 09:40:21
4楼2010-04-15 09:41:47
6楼2010-04-15 09:50:39