|
|
★ oytxtu(金币+10, 翻译EPI+1):三个虫友的翻译都很好!谢谢 2010-04-10 14:36 sirljz(金币+1):谢谢交流 2010-04-10 15:19
1、在文献8中,兰等人只计算了宽度为20的电导。因此在图3中,我们也只能给出这个宽度以内的电导值。
in the reference [8], Lan et al only calculated the conductance with the width of 20. Therefore, in figure 3(c), we can only present this conductance when the width is smaller than 20.
2、根据审稿人的意见,我们拓展电导的电子能量到600mev以及600mev以上。但是,在修改稿的图3中,我们只给出了600mev及600mev以下的电导,是为了使图片更清晰。
According to the referee’s suggestions, we have extended the electron energy of conductance to 600mev or even higher. However, as can be seen from the figure3 of revised manuscript, we can only provide the conductance of 600mev or below 600mev, in order to make this picture clearer. |
|