| 查看: 611 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
luobin13579新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
会议终稿我应该提交初稿，还是修改稿。已有3人参与
|
||
|
呵呵，我是一个硕士生，由于课题需要，老师要求投国际会议，EI论文，看了一大堆文献后（辛苦啊），终于找到一个创新点，做了实验，整理数据。得了一篇英文论文，找了相关联的会议（ICIA）就投了过去，居然得了。惊喜啊！大家帮我看看。 Reviewer 1 ============================================================================ Reviewer's Scores ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originality of Concept: Good Relevance of Applications: Fair Technical Soundness: Good Thoroughness of Results: Good Importance of Results: Good Clarity of Presentation: Good Recommendation: Accept ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Detailed Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- GP surrogate model is adopted to reduce warpage of injection molding parts. Theoretical analysis and experiment results show that the optimization method is efficient for reducing warpage. The paper is clear and organized well. ============================================================================ Reviewer 2 ============================================================================ Reviewer's Scores ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originality of Concept: Very Good Relevance of Applications: Very Good Technical Soundness: Good Thoroughness of Results: Good Importance of Results: Good Clarity of Presentation: Good Recommendation: Definitely Accept ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Detailed Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- In this paper, an adaptive optimization method using Gaussian process surrogate model is developed to minimize warpage of injection molding parts. An enhanced probability improvement selection criterion is proposed based on Gaussian process surrogate model. Under the new criterion, the surrogate model can find the global optima faster. The simulation results show the efficiency of this method. The paper is well organized and the result is interesting. The author name of Ref. [11] is not correct. ============================================================================ 想问一下各位大虫，我投稿后也对论文也做 了大修改，比之前的更完善，那我要不要把后面的修改版提交过去呢？呵呵，我还有个私心，我们老板还希望把我的点子投SCI期刊，我就希望把修改稿投期刊，而会议论文就用原来投的初稿。 大家帮忙指点一下。 [ Last edited by luobin13579 on 2010-4-8 at 11:25 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有36人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有10人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
kerryking
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
苦涩的咖啡有点酸
- 应助: 42 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.03
- 金币: 7065.8
- 散金: 177
- 红花: 55
- 帖子: 2062
- 在线: 1246.5小时
- 虫号: 568283
- 注册: 2008-06-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机软件
3楼2010-04-08 12:01:40
2楼2010-04-08 11:30:52
hzwhut
版主 (著名写手)
- 应助: 143 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.746
- 金币: 5835.7
- 散金: 21191
- 红花: 23
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1372
- 在线: 713.2小时
- 虫号: 950708
- 注册: 2010-01-30
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
- 管辖: 论文道贺祈福
4楼2010-04-08 12:02:39