24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ptf1242

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 8 (幼儿园)
金币: 192.8
散金: 117
红花: 1
帖子: 330
在线: 981.8小时
虫号: 426586
注册: 2007-07-28
性别: GG
专业: 资源利用科学及其他

[交流] 是否是完全拒绝？还是可以修改后再投？已有15人参与

I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication, and I must therefore reject it.

For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below. I encourage you to work some more on this project to address the serious criticisms raised by the reviewers. You can then submit a new manuscript that will be subjected to a new cycle of reviews.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

K. Osseo-Asare
Editor
Hydrometallurgy

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: GENERAL

This paper focused on an important topic on the utilisation of electrolytic manganese (EM) residue as a potential source of manganese recovery. Conventional processing procedures for production of EM were employed for the leaching and purification steps followed by preparation of Mn3O4 product. However, the paper was not well structured and the quality of English was not adequate. It was not technically and economically justified to test the roasting method based on the existing knowledge. It is suggested to revise the paper including (1) rearraging the paper by shortening and moving any relevant and necessary literature parts into the introduction section, (2) omitting roasting related information and results including figures, (3) including information about equipment used for the testing, test scale, parameters monitoring and control, chemical grade, (4) omitting Figures 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and Tables 2, (5) discussing test results based on chemical assay results with
additional visual observations, (6) changing the writing styles to paper formats, (7) giving sufficient references for the literature reviewed which are not well known knowledge, and (8) improving the quality of English.

回复此楼